Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31654762›Full record

ArticleNeuroImage2020

Post-stimulus beta responses are modulated by task duration.

Daisie O Pakenham, Andrew J Quinn, Adam Fry, Susan T Francis, Mark W Woolrich, Matthew J Brookes, Karen J Mullinger

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NeuroImage, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Beta Oscillations and Pupil-Linked Arousal Regulate the Updating of Cognitive Models.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Combining video telemetry and wearable MEG for naturalistic imaging.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. NovelImaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Daisie O PakenhamSir Peter Mansfield Imaging Centre, School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, NG7 2RD, UK.
Andrew J QuinnOxford Centre for Human Brain Activity, Wellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging, Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, UK.
Adam FryDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
Susan T FrancisSir Peter Mansfield Imaging Centre, School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, NG7 2RD, UK.
Mark W WoolrichOxford Centre for Human Brain Activity, Wellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging, Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, UK.
Matthew J BrookesSir Peter Mansfield Imaging Centre, School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, NG7 2RD, UK.
Karen J MullingerSir Peter Mansfield Imaging Centre, School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, NG7 2RD, UK; Centre for Human Brain Health, School of Psychology, University of Birmingham, UK. Electronic address: karen.mullinger@nottingham.ac.uk.

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/K005464/1Medical Research Council MR/L023784/2Medical Research Council MR/M006301/1Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Modulation of beta-band neural oscillations during and following movement is a robust marker of brain function. In particular, the post-movement beta rebound (PMBR), which occurs on movement cessation, has been related to inhibition and connectivity in the healthy brain, and is perturbed in disease. However, to realise the potential of the PMBR as a biomarker, its modulation by task parameters must be characterised and its functional role determined. Here, we used MEG to image brain electrophysiology during and after a grip-force task, with the aim to characterise how task duration, in the form of an isometric contraction, modulates beta responses. Fourteen participants exerted a 30% maximum voluntary grip-force for 2, 5 and 10 s. Our results showed that the amplitude of the PMBR is modulated by task duration, with increasing duration significantly reducing PMBR amplitude and increasing its time-to-peak. No variation in the amplitude of the movement related beta decrease (MRBD) with task duration was observed. To gain insight into what may underlie these trial-averaged results, we used a Hidden Markov Model to identify the individual trial dynamics of a brain network encompassing bilateral sensorimotor areas. The rapidly evolving dynamics of this network demonstrated similar variation with task parameters to the 'classical' rebound, and we show that the modulation of the PMBR can be well-described in terms of increased frequency of beta events on a millisecond timescale rather than modulation of beta amplitude during this time period. Our results add to the emerging picture that, in the case of a carefully controlled paradigm, beta modulation can be systematically controlled by task parameters and such control can reveal new information as to the processes that generate the average beta timecourse. These findings will support design of clinically relevant paradigms and analysis pipelines in future use of the PMBR as a marker of neuropathology.

Indexed as

Functional NeuroimagingMagnetoencephalographyTask Performance and AnalysisAdultBeta RhythmHumansIsometric ContractionMotor ActivityNerve NetSensorimotor CortexTime Factors

Identifiers

PMID31654762
PMCPMC6985901

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.