Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31654652›Full record

ArticlePharmacology, biochemistry, and behavior2019

Ethanol pre-exposure does not increase delay discounting in P rats, but does impair the ability to dynamically adapt behavioral allocation to changing reinforcer contingencies.

Steven Wesley Beckwith, Cristine Lynn Czachowski

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pharmacology, biochemistry, and behavior, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Animal Models of the Behavioral Symptoms of Substance Use Disorders.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in medicine · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Steven Wesley BeckwithAddiction Neuroscience Graduate Program, Department of Psychology, Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis, 402 North Blackford Street, Indianapolis, IN 46202, United States of America. Electronic address: BeckwithS@bvu.edu.
Cristine Lynn CzachowskiAddiction Neuroscience Graduate Program, Department of Psychology, Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis, 402 North Blackford Street, Indianapolis, IN 46202, United States of America.

Funding

Translational Research and Science Education (OUT)P60AA007611 · NIAAA · INDIANA UNIV-PURDUE UNIV AT INDIANAPOLIS · PI DAVID A. KAREKEN · 2003 to 2026
$45.5M
TRAINING GRANT ON GENETICS ASPECTS OF ALCOHOLISMT32AA007462 · NIAAA · INDIANA UNIV-PURDUE UNIV AT INDIANAPOLIS · PI CRISTINE L CZACHOWSKI · 1985 to 2026
$10.7M
NIAAA NIH HHS P60 AA007611NIAAA NIH HHS T32 AA007462
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Increased subjective discounting of delayed rewards is associated with substance abuse, and individuals tend to discount their drug of choice at a greater rate compared to monetary rewards. While there is evidence indicating that increased delay discounting (DD) is a risk factor for substance abuse, some results suggest that exposure to drugs of abuse also increases DD, but effects are mixed. The current study examined whether ethanol pre-exposure increases DD and if an ethanol reinforcer would be discounted at a greater rate than sucrose. Alcohol preferring (P) rats were pre-exposed to either ethanol or sucrose using an intermittent access protocol (IAP) for 8 weeks. Then animals completed an operant fixed choice procedure where each pre-exposure group was split into either an ethanol or sucrose reinforcer group. Afterwards, animals completed an adjusting delay DD task using the same groups as the fixed choice task. Animals that received access to ethanol in the IAP showed increased delayed reward preference in a delay and session dependent manner. Specifically, ethanol pre-exposed animals took more sessions to decrease their preference for the delayed reward at longer delays. In the adjusting delay task, no differences in mean adjusting delays were seen, but ethanol pre-exposure impaired animals' ability to reach stability criteria. The observed results are not consistent with ethanol pre-exposure causing a change in DD. Rather they indicate ethanol pre-exposure impaired animals' ability to reallocate their behavior in response to a change in reinforcer contingencies. The current findings extend prior results showing alcohol naïve P rats exhibit both increased DD and decreased response inhibition (Beckwith and Czachowski 2014, 2016) by demonstrating that after alcohol exposure they exhibit a form of behavioral inflexibility. Hence, a "two-hit" genetic vulnerability/environmental acceleration of addictive behavior is supported.

Indexed as

Reinforcement, PsychologyAlcohol DrinkingAnimalsBehavior, AddictiveBehavior, AnimalConditioning, OperantDelay DiscountingEthanolImpulsive BehaviorMaleRatsRewardSucroseEthanolSucroseBehavioral flexibilityEthanol exposureImpulsivityIntermittent access protocolRatSelected line

Identifiers

PMID31654652
PMCPMC6878995

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.