Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31654610›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of obstetrics and gynecology2020

Associations between the vaginal microbiome and Candida colonization in women of reproductive age.

Brett A Tortelli, Warren G Lewis, Jenifer E Allsworth, Nadum Member-Meneh, Lynne R Foster, Hilary E Reno, Jeffrey F Peipert, Justin C Fay, Amanda L Lewis

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of obstetrics and gynecology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 62 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
62citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

62 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 87 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Contribution ofFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2021
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. InvestigatingIJID regions · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Evaluation ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2026
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Impact of Biofilm Formation by VaginalJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

2 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Brett A TortelliDepartment of Genetics, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO; Molecular Microbiology and Center for Women's Infectious Disease Research, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO.
Warren G LewisMolecular Microbiology and Center for Women's Infectious Disease Research, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO.
Jenifer E AllsworthDepartment of Biomedical and Health Informatics, University of Missouri-Kansas City School of Medicine, Kansas City, MO.
Nadum Member-MenehMolecular Microbiology and Center for Women's Infectious Disease Research, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO.
Lynne R FosterMolecular Microbiology and Center for Women's Infectious Disease Research, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO.
Hilary E RenoDivision of Infectious Diseases, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO.
Jeffrey F PeipertDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN.
Justin C FayDepartment of Genetics, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO; Department of Biology, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY. Electronic address: justin.fay@rochester.edu.
Amanda L LewisMolecular Microbiology and Center for Women's Infectious Disease Research, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO. Electronic address: allewis@wustl.edu.
Washington University in St. Louis · USIndiana University School of MedicineUniversity of Missouri–Kansas City · US

Funding

ROLES OF SIALIDASE IN G. VAGINALIS-HOST INTERACTIONS DURING BACTERIAL VAGINOSISR01AI114635 · NIAID · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI LEWIS, AMANDA L., LEWIS, WARREN G · 2015 to 2025
$5.9M
Glycogen in Bacterial Vaginosis & How Carbohydrates Shape the Vaginal MicrobiomeR01AI127554 · NIAID · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI LEWIS, WARREN G · 2017 to 2021
$1.9M
Yeast-bacterial associations within the gravid vaginal microbiome and risk of preterm birth.F30HD094435 · NICHD · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI TORTELLI, BRETT A · 2018 to 2021
$158k
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI114635NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI127554NICHD NIH HHS F30 HD094435
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe composition of bacteria within the vaginal microbiome has garnered a lot of recent attention and has been associated with reproductive health and disease. Despite the common occurrence of yeast (primarily Candida) within the vaginal microbiome, there is still an incomplete picture of relationships between yeast and bacteria (especially lactobacilli), as well as how such associations are governed. Such relationships could be important to a more holistic understanding of the vaginal microbiome and its connection to reproductive health.

objectiveThe objective of the study was to perform molecular characterization of clinical specimens to define associations between vaginal bacteria (especially Lactobacillus species) and Candida colonization. In vitro studies were conducted to test the 2 most common dominant Lactobacillus species (Lactobacillus crispatus and Lactobacillus iners) in their ability to inhibit Candida growth and to examine the basis for such inhibition. STUDY

designA nested cross-sectional study of reproductive-age women from the Contraceptive CHOICE Project was conducted. Vaginal swabs from 299 women were selected to balance race and bacterial vaginosis status, resulting in a similar representation of black and white women in each of the 3 Nugent score categories (normal [0-3], intermediate [4-6], and bacterial vaginosis [7-10]). Sequencing of the 16S ribosomal gene (V4 region) was used to determine the dominant Lactobacillus species present (primarily Lactobacillus iners and Lactobacillus crispatus), defined as >50% of the community. Subjects without dominance by a single Lactobacillus species were classified as Diverse. A Candida-specific quantitative polymerase chain reaction targeting the internally transcribed spacer 1 was validated using vaginal samples collected from a second cohort of women and used to assess Candida colonization. Two hundred fifty-five nonpregnant women with sufficient bacterial biomass for analysis were included in the final analysis. Generalized linear models were used to evaluate associations between Lactobacillus dominance, sociodemographic and risk characteristics, and vaginal Candida colonization. In separate in vitro studies, the potential of cell-free supernatants from Lactobacillus crispatus and Lactobacillus iners cultures to inhibit Candida growth was evaluated.

resultsForty-two women (16%) were vaginally colonized with Candida. Microbiomes characterized as Diverse (38%), Lactobacillus iners-dominant (39%), and Lactobacillus crispatus-dominant (20%) were the most common. The microbiome, race, and Candida colonization co-varied with a higher prevalence of Candida among black women and Lactobacillus iners-dominant communities compared with white women and Lactobacillus crispatus-dominant communities. Lactobacillus iners-dominant communities were more likely to harbor Candida than Lactobacillus crispatus-dominant communities (odds ratio, 2.85, 95% confidence interval, 1.03-7.21; Fisher exact test, P = .048). In vitro, Lactobacillus crispatus produced greater concentrations of lactic acid and exhibited significantly more pH-dependent growth inhibition of Candida albicans, suggesting a potential mechanism for the clinical observations.

conclusionIn nonpregnant women, Lactobacillus iners-dominant communities were significantly more likely to harbor Candida than Lactobacillus crispatus-dominant communities, suggesting that Lactobacillus species have different relationships with Candida. In vitro experiments indicate that Lactobacillus crispatus may impede Candida colonization more effectively than Lactobacillus iners through a greater production of lactic acid.

Indexed as

CandidaLactobacillus crispatusMicrobiotaAdolescentAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansVaginaYoung AdultCandidaLactobacilluspHracevaginal microbiome

Identifiers

PMID31654610
PMCPMC7236091
OpenAlexW2982002219

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.