Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31654551›Full record

SynthesisJournal of thrombosis and haemostasis : JTH2020

Pharmacological thromboprophylaxis to prevent venous thromboembolism in patients with temporary lower limb immobilization after injury: systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Daniel Horner, John W Stevens, Abdullah Pandor, Tim Nokes, Jonathan Keenan, Kerstin de Wit, Steve Goodacre

Open access · hybridAbstract readSystematic ReviewNetwork Meta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of thrombosis and haemostasis : JTH, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Venous thromboembolism in patients with traumatic pelvic and acetabular fractures: a retrospective cohort study.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. What's new in VTE risk and prevention in orthopedic surgery.Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis · 2020
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Lessons Learned: Using the Caprini Risk Assessment Model to Provide Safe and Efficacious Thromboprophylaxis Following Hip and Knee Arthroplasty.Clinical and applied thrombosis/hemostasis : official journal of the International Academy of Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Daniel HornerEmergency Department, Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust, Salford, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-0400-2017
John W StevensSchool OF Health and Related Research, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
Abdullah PandorSchool OF Health and Related Research, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-2552-5260
Tim NokesUniversity Hospitals Plymouth NHS Trust, Plymouth, UK.
Jonathan KeenanUniversity Hospitals Plymouth NHS Trust, Plymouth, UK.
Kerstin de WitDepartment of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-2763-6474
Steve GoodacreSchool OF Health and Related Research, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-0803-8444
University of Sheffield · GBUniversity Hospitals Plymouth NHS Trust · GBMcMaster University · CASalford Royal NHS Foundation Trust · GB

Funding

Department of Health HTA/15/187/06
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThromboprophylaxis has the potential to reduce venous thromboembolism (VTE) following lower limb immobilization resulting from injury.

objectivesWe aimed to estimate the effectiveness of thromboprophylaxis, compare different agents, and identify any factors associated with effectiveness.

methodsWe undertook a systematic review and network meta-analysis (NMA) of randomized trials reporting VTE or bleeding outcomes that compared thromboprophylactic agents with each other or to no pharmacological prophylaxis, for this indication. An NMA was undertaken for each outcome or agent used, and a series of study-level network meta-regressions examined whether population characteristics, type of injury, treatment of injury, or duration of thromboprophylaxis were associated with treatment effect.

resultsData from 6857 participants across 13 randomized trials showed that, compared with no treatment, low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) reduced the risk of any VTE (odds ratio [OR]: 0.52; 95% credible interval [CrI]: 0.37-0.71), clinically detected deep vein thrombosis (DVT) (OR: 0.39; 95% CrI: 0.12-0.94) and pulmonary embolism (PE) (OR: 0.16; 95% CrI: 0.01-0.74), whereas fondaparinux reduced the risk of any VTE (OR: 0.13; 95% CrI: 0.05-0.30) and clinically detected DVT (OR: 0.10; 95% CrI: 0.01-0.86), with inconclusive results for PE (OR: 0.40; 95% CrI: 0.01-7.53).

conclusionsThromboprophylaxis with either fondaparinux or LMWH appears to reduce the odds of both asymptomatic and clinically detected VTE in people with temporary lower limb immobilization following an injury. Treatment effects vary by outcome and are not always conclusive. We were unable to identify any treatment effect modifiers other than thromboprophylactic agent used.

Indexed as

Venous ThromboembolismAnticoagulantsHeparin, Low-Molecular-WeightHumansLower ExtremityAnticoagulantsHeparin, Low-Molecular-Weightcastsimmobilizationnetwork meta-analysisrisksurgicalvenous thromboembolism

Identifiers

PMID31654551
PMCPMC7028118
OpenAlexW2982243544

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.