Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31654360›Full record

ArticleJournal of general internal medicine2020

Continuing, Withdrawing, and Withholding Medical Treatment at the End of Life and Associated Characteristics: a Mortality Follow-back Study.

Yolanda W H Penders, Matthias Bopp, Ueli Zellweger, Georg Bosshard, Swiss Medical End-of-Life Decisions Study Group

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of general internal medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Yolanda W H PendersEpidemiology, Biostatistics and Prevention Institute, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Matthias BoppEpidemiology, Biostatistics and Prevention Institute, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland. matthias.bopp@uzh.ch.
Ueli ZellwegerEpidemiology, Biostatistics and Prevention Institute, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Georg BosshardClinic for Geriatric Medicine, Zurich University Hospital, and Center on Aging and Mobility, University of Zurich and City Hospital Waid, Zurich, Switzerland.
Swiss Medical End-of-Life Decisions Study Group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundStudies on forgoing treatment often ignore treatments that are continued until death.

objectiveTo investigate how often specific treatments are withdrawn or withheld before death and to describe the associated patient, physician, and care characteristics.

designNational mortality follow-back study in Switzerland in 2013/2014 using a standardized survey to collect information on the patient's end of life and demographics on the physician.

participantsA random sample of adults who died non-suddenly without an external cause and who had met the physician completing the survey (N = 3051). MAIN MEASURES: Any of nine specific treatments was continued until death, withdrawn, or withheld. KEY

resultsIn 2242 cases (84%), at least one treatment was either continued until death or withheld or withdrawn. The most common treatment was artificial hydration, which was continued in 23%, withdrawn in 4%, and withheld in 22% of all cases. The other eight treatments were withdrawn or withheld in 70-94% of applicable cases. The impact of physician characteristics was limited, but artificial hydration, antibiotics, artificial nutrition, and ventilator therapy were more likely to be withheld at home and in nursing homes than in the hospitals.

conclusionsLarge differences exist between care settings in whether treatments are continued, withdrawn, or withheld, indicating the different availability of treatment options or different philosophies of care. While certain patient groups are more likely to have treatment withheld rather than attempted, neither patient nor physician characteristics impact the decision to continue or withdraw treatment.

Indexed as

Decision MakingLife Support CareAdultDeathHumansSwitzerlandWithholding Treatmentend-of-life decisionsmedical decision-makingpalliative carewithholding treatment

Identifiers

PMID31654360
PMCPMC6957664

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.