Trial reportObesity surgery2019
Laparoscopic One-Anastomosis Gastric Bypass with Band-Separated Gastric Pouch (OAGB-BSGP): a Randomized Controlled Trial.
Trial report in Obesity surgery, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Primary and Revisional One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass: A Systematic Review and GRADE-Based IFSO Position Statement.Obesity surgery · 2026Pooled it
- Does One-Anastomosis Gastric Bypass Expose Patients to Gastroesophageal Reflux: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Obesity surgery · 2023Pooled it
- Comparison of Dumping Syndrome After FundoRing and Standard One-anastomosis Gastric Bypass: A Randomized Controlled Trial.Obesity surgery · 2026Trial
- Standardization of surgical technique of the fundoring method for laparoscopic gastric bypass.Scientific reports · 2025Trial
- Comparative endoscopic ultrasound assessment of the gastric pouch after FundoRing-OAGB and OAGB.BMC surgery · 2025Trial
- Concordant and Discordant Interrelationships of the GERD Triad of Symptoms, Endoscopy Findings, and Histopathological Changes Over Time after One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass.Obesity surgery · 2025Article
- Regarding "Revision/Conversion Surgeries After One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass-An Experts' Modified Delphi Consensus".Obesity surgery · 2025Article
- Article
- Article
- IFSO Update Position Statement on One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass (OAGB).Obesity surgery · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundOne-anastomosis gastric bypass with band-separated gastric pouch (OAGB-BSGP) is a novel "staplerless" version of OAGB. This randomized controlled trial (RCT) compared 2-year outcomes for OAGB-BSGP and standard OAGB.
methodsThe parallel-group RCT randomly allocated patients to group A, staplerless OAGB-BSGP, or group B, stapled OAGB.
resultsRespective mean values for groups A and B (n = 40 each): baseline body mass index (BMI, kg/m
conclusionsAt 2-year RCT follow-up, staplerless OAGB-BSGP patients had fewer complications, no revisions, and greater weight loss than stapled OAGB patients.
trial registrationISRCTN56106651 (OSPAN-RCT).
Indexed as
Identifiers
31654345What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.