Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31654337›Full record

ArticleJournal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing2019

Utility of a ripple map for the interpretation of atrial propagation during atrial tachycardia.

Atsuhiko Yagishita, Yoshihide Takahashi, Mihoko Kawabata, Masakazu Kaneko, Masahiro Sekigawa, Tasuku Yamamoto, Kikou Akiyoshi, Yasuhiro Shirai, Shingo Maeda, Shu Yamashita and 4 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Atsuhiko YagishitaDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine/Heart Rhythm Center, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Yushima 1-5-45, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8510, Japan. a.yagisita@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7774-7477
Yoshihide TakahashiDepartment of Advanced Arrhythmia Research, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan.
Mihoko KawabataDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine/Heart Rhythm Center, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Yushima 1-5-45, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8510, Japan.
Masakazu KanekoDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine/Heart Rhythm Center, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Yushima 1-5-45, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8510, Japan.
Masahiro SekigawaDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine/Heart Rhythm Center, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Yushima 1-5-45, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8510, Japan.
Tasuku YamamotoDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine/Heart Rhythm Center, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Yushima 1-5-45, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8510, Japan.
Kikou AkiyoshiDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine/Heart Rhythm Center, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Yushima 1-5-45, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8510, Japan.
Yasuhiro ShiraiDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine/Heart Rhythm Center, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Yushima 1-5-45, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8510, Japan.
Shingo MaedaDepartment of Advanced Arrhythmia Research, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan.
Shu YamashitaHeart Rhythm Center, National Hospital Organization Disaster Medical Center, Tokyo, Japan.
Masahito SuzukiHeart Rhythm Center, National Hospital Organization Disaster Medical Center, Tokyo, Japan.
Takeshi SasakiHeart Rhythm Center, National Hospital Organization Disaster Medical Center, Tokyo, Japan.
Masahiko GoyaDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine/Heart Rhythm Center, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Yushima 1-5-45, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8510, Japan.
Kenzo HiraoDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine/Heart Rhythm Center, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Yushima 1-5-45, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8510, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeRipple map (RM) is a novel method for displaying activation pattern on the surface of a cardiac chamber. The aim of this study was to determine the utility of the RM in interpreting the atrial propagation in atrial tachycardia (AT) in comparison with a conventional local activation (LAT) map.

methodsThree-dimensional electroanatomical mapping and ablation of AT were performed using multielectrode catheters and the CARTO3 ConfiDENSE Module (Biosense Webster). LAT maps and RMs were retrospectively reviewed by two independent observers who were blinded to the ablation results.

resultsHigh-density maps (1683 ± 1362 points) of 45 ATs (274 ± 64 ms; macroreentry 28, focal 17) were obtained in 39 patients. Of the 45 ATs, 41 (91%) were terminated by catheter ablation. A retrospective review of the LAT map alone by two observers resulted in correct diagnosis in 27% (12 ATs), whereas additional reviews of the RMs improved the diagnostic accuracy to 80% (36 ATs, P < 0.001). The diagnostic accuracy using the RM was equally high for macroreentrant (79%) and focal ATs (82%, P = 1.000). Of the 33 LAT maps in disagreement with the observers, adjusting the window-of-interest (WOI) after reviewing the RMs achieved diagnostic agreement of 91% (30 ATs).

conclusionRMs allow us to have precise understanding of the atrial propagation on high-density CARTO maps for both focal and macroreentrant ATs, which is particularly useful for cases with difficult-to-interpret LAT maps.

Indexed as

Catheter AblationAdultAgedAged, 80 and overEpicardial MappingFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesTachycardia, SupraventricularAtrial tachycardiaCatheter ablationLocal activation timeRipple map

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.