Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31654301›Full record

ReviewEnvironmental science and pollution research international2019

Airborne Staphylococcus aureus in different environments-a review.

Anna Kozajda, Karolina Jeżak, Agnieszka Kapsa

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Environmental science and pollution research international, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 47 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
47citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

47 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Methicillin-ResistantInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Review
  4. Preliminary Studies on In Vitro Antibacterial Activity AgainstPharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Microorganisms · 2025
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Kinship analysis ofVeterinary world · 2024
    Article
  17. Understanding the role ofFrontiers in medicine · 2024
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Multi-Host PathogenAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Anna KozajdaNofer Institute of Occupational Medicine, 8 Teresy Str, 91-348, Łódź, Poland. anna.kozajda@imp.lodz.pl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5533-9675
Karolina JeżakNofer Institute of Occupational Medicine, 8 Teresy Str, 91-348, Łódź, Poland.
Agnieszka KapsaNofer Institute of Occupational Medicine, 8 Teresy Str, 91-348, Łódź, Poland.

Funding

Ministerstwo Zdrowia (PL) 6/4/3.1 h/NPZ/2016/312/1659/B
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of the literature review was to describe the environments where the presence of airborne Staphylococcus aureus was confirmed and to catalogue the most often used methods and conditions of bioaerosol sampling to identify the bacteria. The basis for searching of studies on S. aureus in the bioaerosol in different environments was PubMed database resources from the years 1990-2019 (May). The review included studies which were carried on in selected environments: hospitals and other health care facilities, large-scale animal breeding, wastewater treatment plants, residential areas, educational institutions, and other public places. The highest concentrations and genetic diversity of identified S. aureus strains, including MRSA (methicillin-resistant S. aureus), have been shown in large-scale animal breeding. The role of the airborne transmission in dissemination of infection caused by these pathogens is empirically confirmed in environmental studies. Commonly available, well-described, and relatively inexpensive methods of sampling, identification, and subtyping guarantee a high reliability of results and allow to obtain fast and verifiable outcomes in environmental studies on air transmission routes of S. aureus strains.

Indexed as

Air MicrobiologyStaphylococcus aureusAnimalsAnti-Bacterial AgentsHumansMethicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureusMicrobial Sensitivity TestsReproducibility of ResultsStaphylococcal InfectionsAnti-Bacterial Agentsantibiotic resistanceBioaerosolIndoor airMRSAOccupational exposureS. aureus

Identifiers

PMID31654301
PMCPMC6900272

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.