ArticleHernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery2020
Survey of patients regarding experience following repair of inguinal hernias.
Article in Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Outcomes of 207 totally extraperitoneal hernia repairs using self-fixation mesh.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Patient Views Around Their Hernia Surgery: A Worldwide Online Survey Promoted Through Social Media.Frontiers in surgery · 2021Article
- Value and patient appreciation of follow-up after endoscopic totally extraperitoneal (TEP) inguinal hernia repair.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThis study aimed to determine patients' experiences following inguinal hernia repair at a tertiary hospital and associated cottage hospital in terms of postherniorraphy pain and follow-up.
methodsAfter exclusions, 373 adult patients undergoing inguinal hernia repair at Derriford and Tavistock hospitals during a 1-year period from October 2017 were sent a questionnaire regarding preoperative pain experience, current symptoms, and pain severity at 28 days and other intervals postoperatively. Statistical analysis of responses included unpaired t test to compare means and χ
resultsThe survey response rate was 68% (253/373). The mean pain score on visual analogue scale was 1.5 at 28 days postoperatively in those without preoperative pain compared to 3.2 in those with preoperative pain (p = 0.0001). Although 64 (25%) patients complained of pain at a mean follow-up of 47.9 ± 15.6 weeks, pain severity was insignificant after 28 days. Gender, employment status and mesh type did not affect pain scores. Return to normal activity after laparoscopic repair was longer than after open repair (5.4 ± 3.4 versus 4.2 ± 2.2 weeks, respectively; p = 0.0322). Overall, 34.6% thought follow-up was necessary and patients were more likely to agree with a decision not to follow them up.
conclusionThis study puts postherniorrhaphy pain in perspective of preoperative pain. Active discussion with patients prior to discharge or telephone follow-up by an appropriate individual may reduce the need for hospital follow-up.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.