ReviewDrug safety2019
Benefit-Risk Assessment of Alogliptin for the Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.
Review in Drug safety, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.
- From glycemic control to neuroprotection: alogliptin as a repurposed candidate for Huntington's disease.Metabolic brain disease · 2026Review
- Alogliptin Reduces Oxidative Stress in Cardiomyocytes and Ameliorates Diabetic Cardiomyopathy via the AURKB/NLGN2 Signaling.The Kaohsiung journal of medical sciences · 2026Article
- Comparative effectiveness of metformin and alogliptin combination therapy versus metformin monotherapy in patients with type 2 diabetes: an emulated target trial.BMC endocrine disorders · 2025Article
- AI/ML-Driven DPP-4 Inhibitor Predictor (d4p_v1) for Enhanced Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Management: Insights Into Chemical Space, Fingerprints, and Electrostatic Potential Maps.Archiv der Pharmazie · 2025Article
- Type 2 diabetes mellitus - conventional therapies and future perspectives in innovative treatment.Biochemistry and biophysics reports · 2025Review
- Metabolism and Chemical Degradation of New Antidiabetic Drugs (Part II): A Review of Analytical Approaches for Analysis of Gliptins.Biomedicines · 2023Review
- A Comprehensive Review on Weight Loss Associated with Anti-Diabetic Medications.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Investigation of Alogliptin-Loaded In Situ Gel Implants by 2Pharmaceutics · 2022Article
- Changes in clinical trials of endocrine disorder and metabolism and nutrition disorder drugs in mainland China over 2010-2019.Pharmacology research & perspectives · 2021Review
- Neurochemical regulators of food behavior for pharmacological treatment of obesity: current status and future prospects.Future medicinal chemistry · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor (DPP-4i) alogliptin is an oral, antidiabetic treatment that is approved in many countries to treat patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), including the USA, Europe, and Japan. Alogliptin is efficacious both as monotherapy and as add-on/combination therapy with other commonly prescribed T2DM treatments, such as metformin and pioglitazone. Overall, alogliptin is well-tolerated in patients with T2DM, including older patients, those with renal and/or hepatic impairment, and those at high risk of cardiovascular events. There is a low risk of hypoglycemia, weight gain, acute pancreatitis, and gastrointestinal adverse events with alogliptin treatment, as demonstrated in long-term trials (lasting up to 4.5 years) and in a real-world setting. Additionally, alogliptin has a generally favorable or similar safety profile in comparison to other antidiabetic agents (metformin, thiazolidinediones, sulfonylureas, glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists, sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors, α-glucosidase inhibitors, and insulin). However, further evaluation would be required to determine the mechanism and effect of alogliptin on heart failure, bullous pemphigoid, and inflammatory bowel disease. Of note, due to the ethnic diversity in the epidemiology of T2DM, alogliptin has been shown to be more efficacious in Asian patients than in non-Asian patients with T2DM, but with a similar tolerability profile. These data indicate that DPP-4is, including alogliptin, are important treatment options, especially for Asian patients with T2DM, for whom they have potential as a first-line therapy. This benefit-risk assessment aims to place alogliptin within the current armamentarium of T2DM and aid physicians when choosing optimal diabetes treatment for their patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.