Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31654230›Full record

ArticleDie Naturwissenschaften2019

Spatiotemporal niche partitioning in a specious silphid community (Coleoptera: Silphidae Nicrophorus).

Maranda L Keller, Daniel R Howard, Carrie L Hall

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Die Naturwissenschaften, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Maranda L KellerDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of New Hampshire, Spaulding Hall, 38 Academic Way, Durham, NH, 03824, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2731-1082
Daniel R HowardDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of New Hampshire, Spaulding Hall, 38 Academic Way, Durham, NH, 03824, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4190-3746
Carrie L HallDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of New Hampshire, Spaulding Hall, 38 Academic Way, Durham, NH, 03824, USA. carrie.hall@unh.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7781-2205
University of New Hampshire · US

Funding

Advanced Ecology, Ltd 000-2018New Hampshire Agricultural Experiment Station NH00664
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Resource niche partitioning mediates the coexistence of similar species by reducing the chance of competitive encounters. For co-occurring species that share an ephemeral resource, contrasting activity in space and time may facilitate their persistence. Burying beetles (Silphidae: Nicrophorus) depend entirely on small vertebrate carcasses to reproduce. Given the unpredictability of this resource, and its value to congeners and other scavenger species, burying beetles likely endure intense competition to secure a carcass. Here, contrasting spatial and temporal niche patterns are explored as resource allocation strategies among five sympatric species of burying beetles (N. americanus, N. marginatus, N. pustulatus, N. orbicollis, and N. tomentosus). Specifically, the space-use and daily activity patterns are measured, at a fine scale, across species pairs to extrapolate contrasting niche-use patterns within a nicrophorine-rich grassland community in North-Central Oklahoma, USA. The results of this study reveal an important interplay between space-use and daily temporal activity in mediating the scramble competition associated with carrion resources. Where spatial or temporal overlap between burying beetle species is high, direct competition is mediated along an alternative niche dimension. For instance, N. americanus and N. orbicollis, a species dyad thought to be in direct competition, do overlap temporally but were found to have segregated space-use patterns. Our findings provide key insights into the competitive interactions within a necrophilous community and further inform our broader understanding of the spatial and temporal resource dimensions that drive the ecological niche.

Indexed as

EcosystemAnimalsColeopteraMotor ActivityOklahomaSpatio-Temporal AnalysisBurying beetlesInterspecific competitionNiche segregationNicrophorusSpatial nicheTemporal niche

Identifiers

PMID31654230
OpenAlexW2982019109

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.