Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31654182›Full record

ArticleEuropean archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery2020

Value of pre- and intraoperative diagnostic methods in suspected glottic neoplasia.

Camilla Slot Mehlum, Thomas Kjaergaard, Ågot Møller Grøntved, Nina Munk Lyhne, Andreas Peter Schjellerup Jørkov, Preben Homøe, Jesper Filtenborg Tvedskov, Kristian Hveysel Bork, Sören Möller, Gita Jørgensen and 2 more

Erratum issuedOpen access · bronzeAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Correction to: Value of pre- and intraoperative diagnostic methods in suspected glottic neoplasia.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Camilla Slot MehlumDepartment of ORL Head and Neck Surgery and Audiology, Odense University Hospital, J. B. Winsløwsvej 4, 5000, Odense, Denmark. Camilla.mehlum@rsyd.dk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5740-612X
Thomas KjaergaardDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Aarhus University Hospital, Palle Juul-Jensens Boulevard 165, 8200, Aarhus N, Denmark.
Ågot Møller GrøntvedDepartment of ORL Head and Neck Surgery and Audiology, Odense University Hospital, J. B. Winsløwsvej 4, 5000, Odense, Denmark.
Nina Munk LyhneDepartment of Head and Neck Surgery, Aalborg University Hospital, Hobrovej 18-22, 9000, Aalborg, Denmark.
Andreas Peter Schjellerup JørkovDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology and Maxillofacial Surgery, Zealand University Hospital, Lykkebækvej 1, 4600, Køge, Denmark.
Preben HomøeDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology and Maxillofacial Surgery, Zealand University Hospital, Lykkebækvej 1, 4600, Køge, Denmark.
Jesper Filtenborg TvedskovDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, and Audiology, Rigshospitalet, University Hospital of Copenhagen and University of Copenhagen, Blegdamsvej 9, 2100, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Kristian Hveysel BorkDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, and Audiology, Rigshospitalet, University Hospital of Copenhagen and University of Copenhagen, Blegdamsvej 9, 2100, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Sören MöllerOPEN-Open Patient Data Explorative Network and Department of Clinical Research, Odense University Hospital and University of Southern Denmark, J. B. Winsløwsvej 9, 5000, Odense, Denmark.
Gita JørgensenDepartment of ORL Head and Neck Surgery and Audiology, Odense University Hospital, J. B. Winsløwsvej 4, 5000, Odense, Denmark.
Bahareh Bakhshaie PhilipsenDepartment of ORL Head and Neck Surgery and Audiology, Odense University Hospital, J. B. Winsløwsvej 4, 5000, Odense, Denmark.
Christian GodballeDepartment of ORL Head and Neck Surgery and Audiology, Odense University Hospital, J. B. Winsløwsvej 4, 5000, Odense, Denmark.
Odense University Hospital · DKUniversity of Copenhagen · DKZealand University Hospital Køge · DKAalborg University Hospital · DKAarhus University Hospital · DKUniversity of Southern Denmark · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo evaluate the individual and combined ability of videostroboscopy (VS), high-speed digital imaging (HSDI), enhanced endoscopy (EE) and saline infusion (SI) to predict neoplasia, defined as glottic precursor lesion (GPL) or T1a glottic cancer, in patients suspected for glottic neoplasia.

methodsA nationwide prospective cohort study of patients treated by cordectomy for suspected GPL or T1a glottic cancer from August 1st 2016 to October 31st 2018 was conducted in the five Danish University Departments of Head and Neck surgery. Sensitivity, specificity, negative and positive predictive values, and area under Receiver Operating Curves (AUC-ROC) were calculated with 95% confidence intervals with respect to the histological diagnosis. Logistic regression with an imputation model for missing data was applied.

results261 patients aged 34-91 years participated; 79 (30.3%) with non-neoplasia (i.e., inflammation, papilloma, hyperkeratosis) and 182 (69.7%) neoplasia, hereof 95 (36.4%) with GPL and 87 (33.3%) with T1a glottic cancer. Data from 188 VS, 60 HSDI, 100 preoperative EE, 209 intraoperative EE, and 234 SI were analyzed. In the complete case analysis the AUC-ROC of each diagnostic test was low, but increased when the tests were combined and especially if the combination included EE. However, multinomial logistic regression with imputation showed significant association (p < 0.05) only between age, male gender, and perpendicular vasculature in intraoperative EE, and the endpoint neoplasia.

conclusionsIntraoperative EE was the most accurate diagnostic method in detecting neoplasia. The prediction ability of methods applied preoperatively was more limited, but improved when test modalities were combined.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overArea Under CurveFemaleGlottisHumansIntraoperative CareLaryngeal DiseasesLaryngeal NeoplasmsLaryngoscopyLogistic ModelsMaleMiddle AgedPrecancerous ConditionsPreoperative CareDiagnostic accuracyGlotticNeoplasiaPrecursor lesionPremalignant

Identifiers

PMID31654182
OpenAlexW2981799919

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.