ArticleDer Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft2020
[Ophthalmological student teaching-results of a survey at German universities].
Article in Der Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- ["Flipped classroom"-A future concept for student teaching in ophthalmology?]Der Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft · 2021Article
- [Development of a learning target index for ophthalmology].Der Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe deployment of lecturers and different teaching strategies at German university eye clinics were assessed via a questionnaire.
methodsIn an online questionnaire the lecturers at German university eye clinics were asked to answer a total of 28 questions. The questions had been agreed upon by the German Ophthalmological Society (DOG) teaching group.
resultsA total of 30 lecturers from the 36 German university clinics answered the questionnaire (83%). At most of the locations, a half-year course during one semester is held with a median of 180 students taking the course. The median number of teaching hours per semester and clinic was 112 h. Whereas financial support for lecturing is available from the faculty in many locations, only six clinics also allotted lecturers time to organize the teaching. The practical examinations already established in other subjects (objective structured clinical examination, OSCE) are carried out at roughly every third clinic.
conclusionThis survey revealed a high level of commitment on the part of lecturers at German university eye clinics. The diversity of local conditions poses a challenge to ensuring comparable teaching standards in Germany. Support from the respective clinic administration/faculty could be improved at many locations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.