Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31654113›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of nutrition2020

Wheat-induced food allergy in childhood: ancient grains seem no way out.

Steven Sievers, Alexander Rohrbach, Kirsten Beyer

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of nutrition, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Steven SieversDepartment of Pediatric Pneumology and Immunology, Charité Universitätsmedizin, Berlin, Germany. steven.sievers@uni-potsdam.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4265-1974
Alexander RohrbachDepartment of Pediatric Pneumology and Immunology, Charité Universitätsmedizin, Berlin, Germany.
Kirsten BeyerDepartment of Pediatric Pneumology and Immunology, Charité Universitätsmedizin, Berlin, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeWheat is a frequent elicitor of food allergy in childhood. Especially in popular media, the better digestibility and the lower allergenicity of ancient grains are repeatedly postulated. We addressed the question whether ancient wheat-related grains are less allergenic than modern wheat.

methodsProteins from cultivars of spelt, einkorn, emmer and durum along with durum soft wheat flour, Tritordeum and bread wheat were separated by electrophoresis. Immunoblots were performed with a pool serum of six sera from wheat-sensitized children aged 1-11 years (wheat-specific IgE 22 kU

resultsWater/salt-soluble protein patterns were very similar among varieties. In einkorn cultivars, one protein band corresponding to an alpha-amylase/trypsin inhibitor (ATI) was absent. Water-insoluble protein fractions differed markedly among varieties and cultivars. IgE bound to a large number of proteins in all protein fractions both in wheat and in the wheat-related ancient grains.

conclusionsPatients with sensitization to wheat show a significant IgE binding against both modern and ancient grain varieties of the genus Triticum. Therefore, ancient grains do not appear to have a generally reduced risk for wheat allergy sufferers. However, few individuals only sensitized to ATI could benefit from the consumption of einkorn.

Indexed as

Food HypersensitivityWheat HypersensitivityAllergensChildFlourHumansTriticumAllergensAncient grainsATIIgETriticumWheat allergy

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.