ArticleCancer chemotherapy and pharmacology2020
A retrospective study of the correlation of in vitro chemosensitivity using ATP-TCA with patient clinical outcomes in acute myeloid leukemia.
Article in Cancer chemotherapy and pharmacology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Tumour chemotherapy sensitivity test may predict clinical outcomes in colorectal cancer patients receiving oxaliplatin and fluoropyrimidine-based regimens.World journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2025Article
- Soft Tissue Sarcoma Study: Association of Genetic Alterations in the Apoptosis Pathways with Chemoresistance to Doxorubicin.Cancers · 2022Article
- Analysis of Multiple Drug Resistance Mechanism in Different Types of Soft Tissue Sarcomas: Assessment of the Expression of ABC-Transporters, MVP, YB-1, and Analysis of Their Correlation with Chemosensitivity of Cancer Cells.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Article
- Tumor Chemosensitivity Assays Are Helpful for Personalized Cytotoxic Treatments in Cancer Patients.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2021Review
- Article
- Multimodal Treatment of a Peripheral Primitive Neuroectodermal Tumor Originating From the Thoracic Cavity in a Dog.Journal of veterinary internal medicineArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo evaluate the predictive value of the in vitro chemosensitivity using ATP-TCA method to compare the clinical efficacy of patients with AML.
methodsBone marrow or peripheral blood samples were collected from 65 patients with AML, and the in vitro chemosensitivity of four drugs (cytarabine/idarubicin/decitabine/aclacinomycin) was measured by an ATP-tumor chemosensitivity assay.
resultsAclacinomycin and cytarabine had the highest chemosensitivity rates (66.7%, 8/12 and 58.5%, 38/65, respectively), while idarubicin and decitabine had rates of 6.5% (3/46) and 0% (0/35), respectively. Complete remission (CR) was achieved in 66.2% (43/65) of patients, and there was a statistically significant correlation between CR and in vitro chemosensitivity for cytarabine (47.7% vs 18.5%, p = 0.002), but not for the anthracyclines (p = 0.950). In addition, three other factors significantly correlated with CR: disease status (p = 0.005), FLT3-ITD/TKD mutation (p = 0.003) and chemotherapy regimens (p = 0.004). Furthermore, multiple logistic regression analysis revealed that the sensitivity of cytarabine was one of the significant risk factors for CR [hazard ratio (HR) = 5.52; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.47-20.70; p = 0.011].
conclusionsThe in vitro chemosensitivity as tested by ATP-TCA demonstrated a significant correlation with CR for chemotherapy and can be a useful tool to optimize personalized treatments for patients with AML.
Indexed as
Identifiers
31654111What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.