Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31654104›Full record

ArticleDer Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen2020

[Digitalization in surgery : What surgeons currently think and know about it-results of an online survey].

D Wilhelm, M Kranzfelder, D Ostler, A Stier, H J Meyer, H Feussner

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. [DeRAS I-German situation of robotic-assisted surgery-an online survey].Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen · 2021
    Article
  6. [Digital OR].Der Unfallchirurg · 2020
    Review
  7. [Robotic assistance systems for surgery : Current developments and focus of research].Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

D WilhelmFakultät für Medizin, Klinik und Poliklinik für Chirurgie, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675, München, Deutschland. dirk.wilhelm@tum.de.
M KranzfelderFakultät für Medizin, Klinik und Poliklinik für Chirurgie, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675, München, Deutschland.
D OstlerArbeitsgruppe MITI, Fakultät für Medizin, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, München, Deutschland.
A StierKlinik für Allgemein- und Viszeralchirurgie, Helios Klinikum Erfurt GmbH, Erfurt, Deutschland.
H J MeyerDeutsche Gesellschaft für Chirurgie, Berlin, Deutschland.
H FeussnerFakultät für Medizin, Klinik und Poliklinik für Chirurgie, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675, München, Deutschland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe digitalization process is currently on everyone's lips and sweeping changes in the field of public health and especially in surgery are to be expected within the next few years. Besides general issues, such as electronic health records and medical information systems, artificial intelligence, robotics and model-based surgery will decisively impact on the daily routine. In order to provide the necessary knowledge base, to point out related risks and chances and also to define fields of action for surgery, the German Society of Surgery commissioned a position paper on digitalization. A first appraisal in form of an online survey is the subject of this article.

methodsThis article is based on an online survey of the members of the German Society of Surgery and selected members of other related societies. The survey asked for the members' personal assessment concerning different aspects of the digitalization process and the respective state of knowledge as well as the impact on the field of surgery.

resultsA total of 296 members contributed to this survey. According to their assessment, digitalization in surgery is currently associated with terms such as electronic health records and medical information systems but they also assume a relevant influence on their own activities and on the fields of interventional medicine and surgery. A relevant need for improvement of the current state of knowledge was highlighted, not only for general aspects of digitalization but also for surgically relevant issues in particular. The vast majority of interviewed members saw digitalization more as a chance for improvement than as a risk factor.

conclusionAccording to the views of interviewed members of the German Society of Surgery the process of digital transformation will significantly impact the field of surgery. All those involved should feel responsible to contribute to and guide this process in order to maintain the surgically inherent requirements and to protect patient safety. The position paper on digitalization can serve as a basis and should define concrete recommendations for action. In the sense of an academic approach the new possibilities should be critically evaluated with respect to suitability and should be exclusively confined to applications that are beneficial to ourselves and to our patients.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceElectronic Health RecordsGeneral SurgeryRobotic Surgical ProceduresAttitude of Health PersonnelHumansRisk FactorsSurgeonsSurveys and QuestionnairesArtificial intelligenceElectronic health recordPosition paperRoboticsSurgery 4.0

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.