ArticlePediatric cardiology2020
Potential Value of Native T1 Mapping in Symptomatic Adults with Congenital Heart Disease: A Preliminary Study of 3.0 Tesla Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging.
Article in Pediatric cardiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Detecting early structural and functional myocardial alterations in patients with repaired tetralogy of fallot: a prospective MRI study.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- T1 mapping of the right ventricle in congenital heart disease: a focus on pediatrics.Pediatric radiology · 2025Review
- Cardiac and Liver Fibrosis Assessed by Multiparametric MRI in Patients with Fontan Circulation.Pediatric cardiology · 2025Article
- Myocardial Fibrosis in Congenital Heart Disease and the Role of MRI.Radiology. Cardiothoracic imaging · 2023Review
- High-resolution systolic T1 mapping with compressed sensing for the evaluation of the right ventricle: a phantom and volunteer study.The international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2022Article
- Potential of Liver TMagnetic resonance in medical sciences : MRMS : an official journal of Japan Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · 2021Article
- Histological Validation of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance T1 Mapping for Assessing the Evolution of Myocardial Injury in Myocardial Infarction: An Experimental Study.Korean journal of radiology · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The native T1 value at 3.0 Tesla is a sensitive marker of diffuse myocardial damage. We evaluated the clinical usefulness of native T1 mapping in symptomatic adults with congenital heart disease (CHD), particularly in the systemic right ventricle (RV). Prospectively, 45 consecutive symptomatic adults with CHD were enrolled: 20 with systemic RV and 25 with tetralogy of Fallot underwent cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging at 3.0 Tesla. The Modified Look-Locker Inversion recovery sequence was used for T1 mapping. Cardiovascular events in the systemic RV were defined as heart failure and tachyarrhythmia. Brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) and indexed systemic ventricular end-diastolic volume were significantly higher in the systemic RV group. The native T1 value and extracellular volume (ECV) of the septal and lateral walls were higher in the systemic RV group, suggesting high impairment of the myocardium in the systemic RV group. There was a strong correlation between the native T1 value and ECV of the septum (r = 0.58, P = 0.03) and lateral wall (r = 0.56, P = 0.046) in the systemic RV group. Seven patients with systemic RV had cardiovascular events. In univariate logistic regression analysis, BNP and native T1 values of the insertion point were important for predicting cardiovascular events. The native T1 value at 3.0 Tesla may be a sensitive, contrast-free, and non-invasive adjunct marker of myocardial damage in CHD and predictive of cardiovascular events in the systemic RV.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.