Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31653978›Full record

ReviewModern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc2020

Cutaneous soft tissue tumors: how do we make sense of fibrous and "fibrohistiocytic" tumors with confusing names and similar appearances?

Jason L Hornick

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Giant Cutaneous Fibrous Histiocytoma.Radiology. Imaging cancer · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Dermatofibroma: Reappraisal and Updated Review.Clinical, cosmetic and investigational dermatology · 2025
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Diagnosis and differential diagnosis of dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans: Utility of high-resolution dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI.Skin research and technology : official journal of International Society for Bioengineering and the Skin (ISBS) [and] International Society for Digital Imaging of Skin (ISDIS) [and] International Society for Skin Imaging (ISSI) · 2022
    Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jason L HornickDepartment of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States. jhornick@bwh.harvard.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6475-8345
Brigham and Women's Hospital · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the 2018 World Health Organization Classification of Skin Tumors, a wide range of predominantly benign mesenchymal neoplasms are included in the fibroblastic, myofibroblastic, and "fibrohistiocytic" categories. By far the most common of these tumors is dermatofibroma (fibrous histiocytoma). There are many histologic variants of dermatofibroma, some of which (cellular, aneurysmal, and atypical) are associated with a higher risk of local recurrence; these variants may be mistaken for more aggressive tumor types, including sarcomas. Furthermore, distinguishing among the fibrous and "fibrohistiocytic" tumors can be a diagnostic challenge, given their sometimes-similar histologic appearances and confusing nomenclature. Immunohistochemistry and molecular genetic assays play a relatively limited role in the diagnosis of these tumor types, with notable exceptions (i.e., epithelioid fibrous histiocytoma and dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans). Proper recognition of dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans is critical, since this tumor type is associated with locally aggressive behavior; transformation to the fibrosarcomatous variant brings metastatic potential. In recent years, understanding of the molecular pathogenetic basis for cutaneous mesenchymal neoplasms has increased dramatically, with the discovery of gene rearrangements in some of these tumor types. In this review, the histologic features of the most common fibrous and "fibrohistiocytic" cutaneous mesenchymal neoplasms will be discussed, as well as recently identified molecular genetic alterations.

Indexed as

Terminology as TopicBiomarkers, TumorBiopsyDermatofibrosarcomaDiagnosis, DifferentialHistiocytoma, Benign FibrousHumansImmunohistochemistryMolecular Diagnostic TechniquesPredictive Value of TestsSkin NeoplasmsSoft Tissue NeoplasmsBiomarkers, Tumor

Identifiers

PMID31653978
OpenAlexW2981326214

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.