ArticleScientific data2019
Integrated open-source software for multiscale electrophysiology.
Article in Scientific data, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Pooled it
- sEEG-Suite: An Interactive Pipeline for Semi-Automated Contact Localization and Anatomical Labeling with Brainstorm.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- The role of electroencephalography in epilepsy research-From seizures to interictal activity and comorbidities.Epilepsia · 2025Review
- Multiscale Cloud-Based Pipeline for Neuronal Electrophysiology Analysis and Visualization.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- SimplyFire: An Open-Source, Customizable Software Application for the Analysis of Synaptic Events.eNeuro · 2024Article
- Article
- Local neuronal excitation and global inhibition during epileptic fast ripples in humans.Brain : a journal of neurology · 2023Article
- Lexicality-Modulated Influence of Auditory Cortex on Subthalamic Nucleus During Motor Planning for Speech.Neurobiology of language (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2023Article
- Article
- Data platforms for open life sciences-A systematic analysis of management instruments.PloS one · 2022Article
- Article
- Light-weight electrophysiology hardware and software platform for cloud-based neural recording experiments.Journal of neural engineering · 2021Article
- An Open-Source Wireless Electrophysiological Complex for In Vivo Recording Neuronal Activity in the Rodent's Brain.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Recording site placement on planar silicon-based probes affects signal quality in acute neuronal recordings.Scientific reports · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The methods for electrophysiology in neuroscience have evolved tremendously over the recent years with a growing emphasis on dense-array signal recordings. Such increased complexity and augmented wealth in the volume of data recorded, have not been accompanied by efforts to streamline and facilitate access to processing methods, which too are susceptible to grow in sophistication. Moreover, unsuccessful attempts to reproduce peer-reviewed publications indicate a problem of transparency in science. This growing problem could be tackled by unrestricted access to methods that promote research transparency and data sharing, ensuring the reproducibility of published results. Here, we provide a free, extensive, open-source software that provides data-analysis, data-management and multi-modality integration solutions for invasive neurophysiology. Users can perform their entire analysis through a user-friendly environment without the need of programming skills, in a tractable (logged) way. This work contributes to open-science, analysis standardization, transparency and reproducibility in invasive neurophysiology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.