Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31653787›Full record

ArticleGut2020

Gut mycobiome of primary sclerosing cholangitis patients is characterised by an increase of

Malte Christoph Rühlemann, Miriam Emmy Leni Solovjeva, Roman Zenouzi, Timur Liwinski, Martin Kummen, Wolfgang Lieb, Johannes Roksund Hov, Christoph Schramm, Andre Franke, Corinna Bang

Abstract readLetterComment
In one paragraph

Article in Gut, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. iScience · 2025
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Gut microbiome and liver diseases.Fundamental research · 2025
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. The microbiota and the gut-liver axis in primary sclerosing cholangitis.Nature reviews. Gastroenterology & hepatology · 2023
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Malte Christoph RühlemannInstitute of Clinical Molecular Biology, Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel, Kiel, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-0685-0052
Miriam Emmy Leni SolovjevaInstitute of Clinical Molecular Biology, Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel, Kiel, Germany.
Roman ZenouziDepartment of Internal Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Timur LiwinskiDepartment of Internal Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-1041-9142
Martin KummenNorwegian PSC Research Center, Oslo University Hospital, Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway.ORCID 0000-0001-9660-6290
Wolfgang LiebInstitute of Epidemiology and Biobank POPGEN, Christian-Albrechts-University of Kiel, Kiel, Germany.
Johannes Roksund HovNorwegian PSC Research Center, Oslo University Hospital, Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-5900-8096
Christoph SchrammDepartment of Internal Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Andre Franke *Institute of Clinical Molecular Biology, Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel, Kiel, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-1530-5811
Corinna Bang *Institute of Clinical Molecular Biology, Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel, Kiel, Germany c.bang@ikmb.uni-kiel.de.ORCID 0000-0001-6814-6151

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

Cholangitis, SclerosingGastrointestinal MicrobiomeMycobiomeAscomycotaCandidaDysbiosisHumansmycobiomeprimary sclerosing cholangitis

Identifiers

PMID31653787
PMCPMC7497579

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.