Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31653756›Full record

Observational studyJournal of neurointerventional surgery2020

Efficacy and safety of the dual-layer flow-diverting stent (FRED) for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms.

Leopoldo Guimaraens, Elio Vivas, Jesus Saldaña, Juan Carlos Llibre, Alberto Gil, Ernest Balaguer, Ana Rodríguez-Campello, Elisa Cuadrado-Godia, Angel Ois

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Journal of neurointerventional surgery, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Flow redirection endoluminal device (FRED) for treatment of intracranial aneurysms: A systematic review.Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Usefulness of silent magnetic resonance angiography for intracranial aneurysms treated with a flow re-direction endoluminal device.Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences · 2025
    Article
  5. Observational
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Observational
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Leopoldo GuimaraensInterventional Neuroradiology, Hospital General de Cataluña, Sant Cugat del Vallès, Spain.
Elio VivasInterventional Neuroradiology, Hospital General de Cataluña, Sant Cugat del Vallès, Spain evivas@gmail.com.
Jesus SaldañaInterventional Neuroradiology, Hospital General de Cataluña, Sant Cugat del Vallès, Spain.
Juan Carlos LlibreInterventional Neuroradiology, Hospital General de Cataluña, Sant Cugat del Vallès, Spain.
Alberto GilInterventional Neuroradiology, Hospital General de Cataluña, Sant Cugat del Vallès, Spain.
Ernest BalaguerInterventional Neuroradiology, Hospital General de Cataluña, Sant Cugat del Vallès, Spain.
Ana Rodríguez-CampelloNeurology, Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, Spain.
Elisa Cuadrado-GodiaNeurology, Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, Spain.
Angel OisNeurology, Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1375-5950

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo describe the efficacy and complications of treating cerebral aneurysms with the Flow Re-direction Endoluminal Device (FRED) and to identify predictors for aneurysm occlusion.

methodsA prospective observational registry including all consecutive aneurysms treated with FRED between December 2015 and July 2018 was designed in one therapeutic neuroangiography department. The primary endpoint for treatment efficacy was complete or near-complete occlusion (O'Kelly-Marotta (OKM) C-D), assessed by three-dimensional digital subtraction angiography. Major (all symptomatics) and minor complications were described and those with modified Rankin Scale scores 3-6 were considered clinically relevant. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify predictors of efficacy.

resultsA total of 185 aneurysms were analyzed in 150 patients (mean age 54.3±11.5 years). Mean follow-up was 18.99±11.32 months (range 0-43). Efficacy was evaluated in 156 (84.32%) cases: 132 (84.6%) had OKM C-D occlusion, 31/47 (66%) within the first year and 101/109 (92.7%) later on. Major complications were observed in 12 (6.5%) cases: three strokes (one transient ischemic accident, two minor strokes), six intra-stent thrombosis, and three with bleeding, but only one (0.5%) was clinically relevant. Minor complications (all asymptomatic) were observed in 10 (5.4%) cases: three shortening/repositioning of stent; two arterial dissection, two arterial occlusion, and three intra-stent stenosis. Independent predictors of occlusion were immediate OKM grade B-C-D (OR 4.01, 95% CI 1.51 to 10.62), single aneurysm (OR 3.29, 95% CI 1.05 to 10.32), and small size aneurysm (OR 4.74, 95% CI 1.57 to 14.30).

conclusionThe FRED stent fully complied with efficacy and safety requirements for treatment of intracranial aneurysms. Three predictors of aneurysm occlusion were identified.

Indexed as

Self Expandable Metallic StentsAdultAgedAngiography, Digital SubtractionEmbolization, TherapeuticEndovascular ProceduresFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansIntracranial AneurysmMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesRegistriesTreatment Outcomeaneurysmflow Diverterstent

Identifiers

PMID31653756
PMCPMC7231461

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.