Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31653440›Full record

ArticleAtencion primaria

[Contributions on the editorial: "Importance of Research Ethics Committees in Family Medicine"].

Isabel Sastre Gervás, Juana María Cruz Del Río, Natalia Cal Purriños, Rosendo Bugarín González

Abstract readLetterComment
In one paragraph

Article in Atencion primaria. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Isabel Sastre GervásComité Territorial de Ética da Investigación de A Coruña-Ferrol, A Coruña, España; Unidad de Farmacia de Atención Primaria, Centro de Salud San José-A, EOXI de A Coruña, Servizo Galego de Saúde, A Coruña, España. Electronic address: Maria.Isabel.Sastre.Gervas@sergas.es.
Juana María Cruz Del RíoComité Territorial de Ética da Investigación de A Coruña-Ferrol, A Coruña, España; Comité de Ética da Investigación con Medicamentos de Galicia, Santiago de Compostela, A Coruña, España; Secretaría Xeral Técnica, Consellería de Sanidade, Santiago de Compostela, A Coruña, España.
Natalia Cal PurriñosComité Territorial de Ética da Investigación de A Coruña-Ferrol, A Coruña, España; Fundación Profesor Novoa Santos, Instituto Investigación Biomédica A Coruña-INIBIC, A Coruña, España.
Rosendo Bugarín GonzálezComité de Ética da Investigación con Medicamentos de Galicia, Santiago de Compostela, A Coruña, España; Medicina Familiar y Comunitaria, Centro de Salud de Monforte de Lemos, EOXI de Lugo, Cervo y Monforte, Servizo Galego de Saúde, Monforte de Lemos, Lugo, España.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

Biomedical ResearchEthics Committees, ResearchFamily Practice

Identifiers

PMID31653440
PMCPMC7256777

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.