ArticleBMC cancer2019
lionessR: single sample network inference in R.
Article in BMC cancer, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
31 citing papers in PubMed.
- BLOBFISH: bipartite limited subnetworks from multiple observations using breadth-first search with constrained hops.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2026Article
- Ten quick tips for causal analysis of biomedical omics data.PLoS computational biology · 2026Article
- Cell line-specific gene network enrichment analysis for interpreting continuous phenotypes.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2026Article
- Epitope Generation Gateway: A biological context-dependent approach to cancer vaccine development.GigaScience · 2026Article
- Sample-specific network analysis identifies gene co-expression patterns of immunotherapy response in clear cell renal cell carcinoma.iScience · 2025Article
- Utilizing cohort-level and individual networks to predict best response in patients with metastatic triple negative breast cancer.NPJ precision oncology · 2025Article
- Single-Sample Networks Reveal Intra-Cytoband Co-Expression Hotspots in Breast Cancer Subtypes.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
- A python library for the fast and scalable computation of biologically meaningful individual specific networks.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Transgenerational Epigenetic Inheritance of Cardiovascular Diseases: A Network Medicine Perspective.Maternal and child health journal · 2024Review
- Intracellular proteomics and extracellular vesiculomics as a metric of disease recapitulation in 3D-bioprinted aortic valve arrays.Science advances · 2024Article
- CXCL10/IgG1 Axis in Multiple Sclerosis as a Potential Predictive Biomarker of Disease Activity.Neurology(R) neuroimmunology & neuroinflammation · 2024Article
- Current and future directions in network biology.Bioinformatics advances · 2024Article
- Individual-network based predictions of microbial interaction signatures for response to biological therapies in IBD patients.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2024Article
- Adjustment of spurious correlations in co-expression measurements from RNA-Sequencing data.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2023Article
- Edge and modular significance assessment in individual-specific networks.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- The Network Zoo: a multilingual package for the inference and analysis of gene regulatory networks.Genome biology · 2023Article
- Single-cell gene regulatory network prediction by explainable AI.Nucleic acids research · 2023Article
- PLEX.I: a tool to discover features in multiplex networks that reflect clinical variation.Frontiers in genetics · 2023Article
- Capturing the dynamics of microbial interactions through individual-specific networks.Frontiers in microbiology · 2023Article
- Proceedings of the fifth international Molecular Pathological Epidemiology (MPE) meeting.Cancer causes & control : CCC · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundIn biomedical research, network inference algorithms are typically used to infer complex association patterns between biological entities, such as between genes or proteins, using data from a population. This resulting aggregate network, in essence, averages over the networks of those individuals in the population. LIONESS (Linear Interpolation to Obtain Network Estimates for Single Samples) is a method that can be used together with a network inference algorithm to extract networks for individual samples in a population. The method's key characteristic is that, by modeling networks for individual samples in a data set, it can capture network heterogeneity in a population. LIONESS was originally made available as a function within the PANDA (Passing Attributes between Networks for Data Assimilation) regulatory network reconstruction framework. However, the LIONESS algorithm is generalizable and can be used to model single sample networks based on a wide range of network inference algorithms.
resultsIn this software article, we describe lionessR, an R implementation of LIONESS that can be applied to any network inference method in R that outputs a complete, weighted adjacency matrix. As an example, we provide a vignette of an application of lionessR to model single sample networks based on correlated gene expression in a bone cancer dataset. We show how the tool can be used to identify differential patterns of correlation between two groups of patients.
conclusionsWe developed lionessR, an open source R package to model single sample networks. We show how lionessR can be used to inform us on potential precision medicine applications in cancer. The lionessR package is a user-friendly tool to perform such analyses. The package, which includes a vignette describing the application, is freely available at: https://github.com/kuijjerlab/lionessR and at: http://bioconductor.org/packages/lionessR .
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.