Observational studyBMC health services research2019
Facilitating smoking cessation in patients who smoke: a large-scale cross-sectional comparison of fourteen groups of healthcare providers.
Observational study in BMC health services research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
34 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Physician Reluctance to Intervene in Addiction: A Systematic Review.JAMA network open · 2024Pooled it
- Effectiveness of an in-office intervention to improve general practitioners' support for tobacco smoking cessation: results from a randomised controlled trial (TABAC-PRO).BMC primary care · 2026Trial
- Article
- Assessment and Use of Electronic Patient Records for Smoking Cessation Support in Hospital Setting: A Cross-Sectional Study.Health promotion journal of Australia : official journal of Australian Association of Health Promotion Professionals · 2026Article
- Intention to quit smoking and associated factors among outpatients at a tertiary hospital in semi-urban Nepal: a cross-sectional study.BMJ public health · 2026Article
- Implementation of stop smoking support by mental healthcare professionals: cross-sectional analysis of why nothing much happens.Discover mental health · 2025Article
- Correlates of Tobacco Use Among People with Mental Illness Within Asia: A Scoping Review.Community mental health journal · 2025Article
- Identifying roles in smoking cessation care for different types of healthcare providers: a qualitative study with people who smoke.Frontiers in health services · 2025Article
- The role of general practice nurses in supporting people to quit smoking: A qualitative study.PloS one · 2024Article
- Effects of a Smoking Cessation Counseling Education Program on Nursing Students.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Attitudes and practices of health care providers towards improving adherence to smoking cessation medications in Australia: A descriptive study.Health promotion journal of Australia : official journal of Australian Association of Health Promotion Professionals · 2023Article
- The delivery of Ask-Advise-Connect for smoking cessation in Dutch general practice during the COVID-19 pandemic: results of a pre-post implementation study.BMC health services research · 2023Article
- Barriers to the provision of smoking cessation intervention/services: A mixed-methods study among health care workers in Zambezi region, Namibia.Journal of public health in Africa · 2023Article
- Feasibility of tobacco cessation intervention at non-communicable diseases clinics: A qualitative study from a North Indian State.PloS one · 2023Article
- Implementing smoking cessation in routine primary care-a qualitative study.Frontiers in health services · 2023Article
- Smoking cessation in dental setting: a narrative review on dental professionals' attitude, preparedness, practices and barriers.Frontiers in oral health · 2023Review
- Documentation of smoking in scheduled asthma contacts in primary health care: a 12-year follow-up study.NPJ primary care respiratory medicine · 2022Article
- Identified or conflicted: a latent class and regression tree analysis explaining how identity constructs cluster within smokers.BMC psychology · 2022Article
- Optimizing Smoking Cessation Counseling in a University Hospital: Results and Pitfalls.Frontiers in health services · 2022Article
- Smoking among adult congenital heart disease survivors in the United States: Prevalence and relationship with illness perceptions.Journal of behavioral medicine · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAlthough healthcare providers are well placed to help smokers quit, implementation of smoking cessation care is still suboptimal. The Ask-Advise-Refer tasks are important aspects of smoking cessation care. We examined to which extent a large and diverse sample of healthcare providers expressed the intention to implement smoking cessation care and which barriers they encountered. We moreover examined to which extent the Ask-Advise-Refer tasks were implemented as intended, and which determinants (in interaction) influenced intentions and the implementation of Ask-Advise-Refer.
methodsCross-sectional survey among addiction specialists, anaesthesiologists, cardiologists, general practitioners, internists, neurologists, paediatricians, pulmonologists, ophthalmologists, surgeons, youth specialists, dental hygienists, dentists, and midwives (N = 883). Data were analysed using multivariate linear and logistic regression analyses and regression tree analyses.
resultsThe Ask-Advice-Refer tasks were best implemented among general practitioners, pulmonologists, midwives, and addiction specialists. Overall we found a large discrepancy between asking patients about smoking status and advising smokers to quit. Participants mentioned lack of time, lack of training, lack of motivation to quit in patients, and smoking being a sensitive subject as barriers to smoking cessation care. Regression analyses showed that the most important determinants of intentions and implementation of Ask-Advise-Refer were profession, role identity, skills, guideline familiarity and collaboration agreements for smoking cessation care with primary care. Determinants interacted in explaining outcomes.
conclusionsThere is much to be gained in smoking cessation care, given that implementation of Ask-Advise-Refer is still relatively low. In order to improve smoking cessation care, changes are needed at the level of the healthcare provider (i.e., facilitate role identity and skills) and the organization (i.e., facilitate collaboration agreements and guideline familiarity). Change efforts should be directed towards the specific barriers encountered by healthcare providers, the contexts that they work in, and the patients that they work with.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.