Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31653211›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2019

Barriers to and solutions for addressing insufficient professional interpreter use in primary healthcare.

Fabienne N Jaeger, Nicole Pellaud, Bénédicte Laville, Pierre Klauser

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Exploring Self-Report Dietary Assessment Tools Validated for Indigenous Populations Globally: A Scoping Review.Health promotion journal of Australia : official journal of Australian Association of Health Promotion Professionals · 2025
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Fabienne N JaegerKollegium für Hausarztmedizin, Rue de l'Hôpital 15, CH-1701, Berne, Fribourg, Switzerland. fabienne.jaeger@swisstph.ch.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8441-3907
Nicole PellaudKollegium für Hausarztmedizin, Rue de l'Hôpital 15, CH-1701, Berne, Fribourg, Switzerland.
Bénédicte LavilleKollegium für Hausarztmedizin, Rue de l'Hôpital 15, CH-1701, Berne, Fribourg, Switzerland.
Pierre KlauserKollegium für Hausarztmedizin, Rue de l'Hôpital 15, CH-1701, Berne, Fribourg, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe aim of this nationwide study was to investigate barriers to adequate professional interpreter use and to describe existing initiatives and identify key factors for successful interpreter policies in primary care, using Switzerland as a case study.

methodsAdult and paediatric primary care providers were invited to participate in an online cross-sectional questionnaire-based study. All accredited regional interpreter agencies were contacted first by email and, in the absence of a reply, by mail and then by phone. Local as well as the national health authorities were asked about existing policies.

results599 primary care physicians participated. Among other reasons, physicians identified cumbersome organization (58.7%), absent financial coverage (53.7%) and lack of knowledge on how to arrange interpreter interventions (44%) as main barriers. The odds of organising professional interpreters were 6.6-times higher with full financial coverage. Some agencies confirmed difficulties providing professional interpreters for certain languages at a timely manner. Degrees of coverage of professional interpreter costs (full coverage to none) and organization varied between regions resulting in different levels of unmet needs.

conclusionsProfessional interpreter use can be improved through the following points: increase awareness and knowledge of primary care providers on interpreter use and organization, ensure financial coverage, as well as address organizational aspects. Examples of successful interventions exist.

Indexed as

Health Services AccessibilityTranslatingAdultAllied Health PersonnelChildCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHealth Services ResearchHumansMalePhysicians, Primary CarePrimary Health CareSurveys and QuestionnairesSwitzerlandAccessFamily doctorsFinancingHealth services organizationImmigrantInterpreterLanguage barrierMigrantPaediatricPrimary care

Identifiers

PMID31653211
PMCPMC6815061

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.