Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31653136›Full record

ArticleAsian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP2019

High Resolution Based Quantitative Determination of Methylation Status of CDH1 and VIM Gene in Epithelial Ovarian Cancer.

Gaurav Kr Thakur, Tusha Sharma, T Krishna Latha, B D Banerjee, Harendra Kr Shah, Kiran Guleria

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 90% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Exploring vimentin expression and its protein interactors across diverse cancer types via the cancer genome atlas datasets: a comprehensive analysis.Reports of practical oncology and radiotherapy : journal of Greatpoland Cancer Center in Poznan and Polish Society of Radiation Oncology · 2025
    Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Gaurav Kr ThakurEnvironmental and Molecular Biology Laboratory, Department of Biochemistry, University College of Medical Sciences (Delhi University) and GTB Hospital, Dilshad Garden, Delhi, India.
Tusha SharmaEnvironmental and Molecular Biology Laboratory, Department of Biochemistry, University College of Medical Sciences (Delhi University) and GTB Hospital, Dilshad Garden, Delhi, India.
T Krishna LathaEnvironmental and Molecular Biology Laboratory, Department of Biochemistry, University College of Medical Sciences (Delhi University) and GTB Hospital, Dilshad Garden, Delhi, India.
B D BanerjeeEnvironmental and Molecular Biology Laboratory, Department of Biochemistry, University College of Medical Sciences (Delhi University) and GTB Hospital, Dilshad Garden, Delhi, India.ORCID 0000000283483989
Harendra Kr ShahEnvironmental and Molecular Biology Laboratory, Department of Biochemistry, University College of Medical Sciences (Delhi University) and GTB Hospital, Dilshad Garden, Delhi, India.
Kiran GuleriaDepartment of Obst and Gynae, University College of Medical Sciences (Delhi University) and GTB Hospital, Dilshad Garden, Delhi, India.
University College of Medical Sciences · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDNA promoter methylation is widely explored epigenetic phenomena, known to effect gene expression and further perturbation in cellular homeostasis. Myriad of studies have leveraged promoter methylation and its potential as biomarker for various types of cancer. Aim of present study is to investigate promoter methylation of CDH1 and VIM gene and etiology of epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC).

methodsMost of previous studies were qualitative; we have quantitatively assessed methylation levels in 50 EOC cases and control each through high recognition melt (HRM) technique.

resultsAt 10 % cutoff for CDH1 94% of EOC cases were found to be methylated with mean methylation of 45±13.8, whereas for control mean methylation was found to be 7.3±3.7 amongst 16 % methylation positive control samples. For VIM methylation was detected in 96% of cases with mean of 50.44±11.7 in EOC and in 12% methylation positive samples for control mean methylation was 6.24±4.3.

conclusionIn short HRM based DNA methylation can serve as a robust and sensitive diagnostic method for promoter methylation detection and as a biomarker for early epithelial ovarian cancer detection.

Indexed as

DNA MethylationGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticAntigens, CDBiomarkers, TumorCadherinsCarcinoma, Ovarian EpithelialCase-Control StudiesFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMiddle AgedPrognosisPromoter Regions, GeneticVimentinAntigens, CDBiomarkers, TumorCadherinsCDH1 protein, humanVimentinVIM protein, humanBiomarkerEpithelial Ovarian CancerHRMmethylation

Identifiers

PMID31653136
PMCPMC6982649
OpenAlexW2979660192

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.