Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31653003›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2019

Recovery from Anesthesia after Robotic-Assisted Radical Cystectomy: Two Different Reversals of Neuromuscular Blockade.

Claudia Claroni, Marco Covotta, Giulia Torregiani, Maria Elena Marcelli, Gabriele Tuderti, Giuseppe Simone, Alessandra Scotto di Uccio, Antonio Zinilli, Ester Forastiere

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Claudia ClaroniDepartment of Anaesthesiology, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, 00144 Rome, Italy. claroni@icloud.com.ORCID 0000-0003-3323-616X
Marco CovottaDepartment of Anaesthesiology, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, 00144 Rome, Italy. marco.covotta@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-8358-5977
Giulia TorregianiDepartment of Anaesthesiology, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, 00144 Rome, Italy. giulia.torregiani@gmail.com.
Maria Elena MarcelliDepartment of Anaesthesiology, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, 00144 Rome, Italy. mariaelena.marcelli@gmail.com.
Gabriele TudertiDepartment of Urology, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, 00144 Rome, Italy. gabriele.tuderti@gmail.com.
Giuseppe SimoneDepartment of Urology, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, 00144 Rome, Italy. puldet@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-4868-9025
Alessandra Scotto di UccioSchool of Medicine, University Hospital Center "Tor Vergata", 00133 Rome, Italy. allascotto@gmail.com.
Antonio ZinilliIRCrES, Research Institute on Sustainable Economic Growth of the National Research Council of Italy, 00185 Rome, Italy. antonio.zinilli@ircres.cnr.it.ORCID 0000-0002-3539-0016
Ester ForastiereDepartment of Anaesthesiology, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, 00144 Rome, Italy. ester.forastiere@ifo.gov.it.
Istituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico · ITResearch Institute on Sustainable Economic Growth · ITUniversity of Rome Tor Vergata · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

During robot-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC), specific surgical conditions (a steep Trendelenburg position, prolonged pneumoperitoneum, effective myoresolution until the final stages of surgery) can seriously impair the outcomes. The aim of the study was to evaluate the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) and ileus and the quality of cognitive function at the awakening in two groups of patients undergoing different reversals. In this randomized trial, patients that were American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status (ASA) ≤III candidates for RARC for bladder cancer were randomized into two groups: In the sugammadex (S) group, patients received 2 mg/kg of sugammadex as reversal of neuromuscolar blockade; in the neostigmine (N) group, antagonization was obtained with neostigmine 0.04 mg/kg + atropine 0.02 mg/kg. PONV was evaluated at 30 min, 6 and 24 h after anesthesia. Postoperative cognitive functions and time to resumption of intestinal transit were also investigated. A total of 109 patients were analyzed (54 in the S group and 55 in the N group). The incidence of early PONV was lower in the S group but not statistically significant (S group 25.9% vs. N group 29%;

Indexed as

anesthesia recovery periodsbladder cancercognitive impairmentgamma-cyclodextrinsneuromuscular blockaderobotic radical cystectomy

Identifiers

PMID31653003
PMCPMC6912240
OpenAlexW2982029790

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.