Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31652993›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2019

Combination of Anti-Cancer Drugs with Molecular Chaperone Inhibitors.

Maxim Shevtsov, Gabriele Multhoff, Elena Mikhaylova, Atsushi Shibata, Irina Guzhova, Boris Margulis

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 59 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. TargetingFrontiers in oncology · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Maxim ShevtsovCenter for Translational Cancer Research, TUM (TranslaTUM), Technische Universität München (TUM), Klinikum rechts der Isar, Radiation Immuno Oncology, Einsteinstr. 25, 81675 Munich, Germany. shevtsov-max@mail.ru.ORCID 0000-0002-8539-2239
Gabriele MulthoffCenter for Translational Cancer Research, TUM (TranslaTUM), Technische Universität München (TUM), Klinikum rechts der Isar, Radiation Immuno Oncology, Einsteinstr. 25, 81675 Munich, Germany. gabriele.multhoff@tum.de.ORCID 0000-0002-2616-3137
Elena MikhaylovaInstitute of Cytology of the Russian Academy of Sciences (RAS), Tikhoretsky Ave., 4, St. Petersburg 194064, Russia. mikhailovaer@yandex.ru.
Atsushi ShibataSignal Transduction Program, Gunma University Initiative for Advanced Research (GIAR), Gunma University, Maebashi, Gunma 371-8511, Japan. shibata.at@gunma-u.ac.jp.ORCID 0000-0001-8912-6977
Irina GuzhovaInstitute of Cytology of the Russian Academy of Sciences (RAS), Tikhoretsky Ave., 4, St. Petersburg 194064, Russia. irina.guzh@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-8775-7713
Boris MargulisInstitute of Cytology of the Russian Academy of Sciences (RAS), Tikhoretsky Ave., 4, St. Petersburg 194064, Russia. margulis@incras.ru.
Institute of Cytology · RUFar Eastern Federal University · RUGunma University · JPTUM Klinikum · DE

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft SFB 824/3Russian Science Foundation 19-74-20161Российский Фонд Фундаментальных Исследований (РФФИ) 19-08-00024
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Most molecular chaperones belonging to heat shock protein (HSP) families are known to protect cancer cells from pathologic, environmental and pharmacological stress factors and thereby can hamper anti-cancer therapies. In this review, we present data on inhibitors of the heat shock response (particularly mediated by the chaperones HSP90, HSP70, and HSP27) either as a single treatment or in combination with currently available anti-cancer therapeutic approaches. An overview of the current literature reveals that the co-administration of chaperone inhibitors and targeting drugs results in proteotoxic stress and violates the tumor cell physiology. An optimal drug combination should simultaneously target cytoprotective mechanisms and trigger the imbalance of the tumor cell physiology.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsDrug Therapy, CombinationHeat-Shock ProteinsHSP70 Heat-Shock ProteinsHSP90 Heat-Shock ProteinsHumansIsoxazolesMolecular ChaperonesNeoplasmsOligonucleotidesResorcinols5-(2,4-dihydroxy-5-isopropylphenyl)-4-(4-morpholin-4-ylmethylphenyl)isoxazole-3-carboxylic acid ethylamideAntineoplastic AgentsapatorsenHeat-Shock ProteinsHSP70 Heat-Shock ProteinsHSP90 Heat-Shock ProteinsHSPB1 protein, humanIsoxazolesMolecular ChaperonesOligonucleotidesResorcinolscancer therapyconcurrent therapyheat shock protein inhibitorsHSP27HSP70HSP90molecular chaperones

Identifiers

PMID31652993
PMCPMC6862641
OpenAlexW2982048821

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.