Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31652871›Full record

ArticleViruses2019

The Effect of a Commercially Available Bacteriophage and Bacteriocin on

Rhea Lewis, Andrei Sorin Bolocan, Lorraine A Draper, R Paul Ross, Colin Hill

Open access · goldAbstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Viruses, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Phage P100 resistance in clinical and foodborneCurrent research in microbial sciences · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Phage-Based Control ofViruses · 2025
    Review
  7. Review
  8. The Effectiveness of LISTEXCurrent pharmaceutical biotechnology · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Rhea LewisAPC Microbiome Ireland, University College Cork, Cork T12 YT20, Ireland. rhea.lewis@umail.ucc.ie.
Andrei Sorin BolocanAPC Microbiome Ireland, University College Cork, Cork T12 YT20, Ireland. andrei.s.bolocan@gmail.com.
Lorraine A DraperAPC Microbiome Ireland, University College Cork, Cork T12 YT20, Ireland. L.Draper@ucc.ie.
R Paul RossAPC Microbiome Ireland, University College Cork, Cork T12 YT20, Ireland. p.ross@ucc.ie.
Colin HillAPC Microbiome Ireland, University College Cork, Cork T12 YT20, Ireland. c.hill@ucc.ie.
University College Cork · IE

Funding

Science Foundation Ireland SFI/12/RC/2273
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Changing consumer attitudes show an increased interest in non-chemical antimicrobials in food preservation and safety. This greater interest of consumers in more 'natural' or 'clean-label' food interventions is complicated by concurrent demands for minimally processed, ready-to-eat (RTE) foods with long shelf lives. Two viable interventions are bacteriophage (phage) and bacteriocins, a number of which have already been approved for use in food safety. Listeriosis is a serious foodborne infection which affects at-risk members of the population. Listeriosis incidence has increased between 2008 and 2015 and has a case fatality rate of up to 20% with antibiotic intervention. Here, we tested an intervention to attempt to control a pathogenic

Indexed as

BacteriocinsBacteriophagesBrassicaFermented FoodsFood ContaminationFood MicrobiologyFood PreservationListeria monocytogenesBacteriocinsbacteriocinfood safetyListeria monocytogenesphage

Identifiers

PMID31652871
PMCPMC6893746
OpenAlexW2981761745

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.