Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31652787›Full record

ReviewCancers2019

Clinical Challenges and Consequences of Measurable Residual Disease in Non-APL Acute Myeloid Leukemia.

Madlen Jentzsch, Sebastian Schwind, Enrica Bach, Sebastian Stasik, Christian Thiede, Uwe Platzbecker

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancers, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Cell-free DNA profiling informs all major complications of hematopoietic cell transplantation.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  6. Fusion Oncoproteins in Childhood Cancers: Potential Role in Targeted Therapy.The journal of pediatric pharmacology and therapeutics : JPPT : the official journal of PPAG · 2021
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Madlen JentzschMedical Clinic and Policlinic 1, Hematology and Cellular Therapy, Leipzig University Hospital, 04103 Leipzig, Germany. madlen.jentzsch@medizin.uni-leipzig.de.ORCID 0000-0002-2270-0804
Sebastian SchwindMedical Clinic and Policlinic 1, Hematology and Cellular Therapy, Leipzig University Hospital, 04103 Leipzig, Germany. sebastian.schwind@medizin.uni-leipzig.de.ORCID 0000-0002-1315-2332
Enrica BachMedical Clinic and Policlinic 1, Hematology and Cellular Therapy, Leipzig University Hospital, 04103 Leipzig, Germany. enrica.bach@medizin.uni-leipzig.de.
Sebastian StasikMedical Department I, University Hospital and Faculty of Medicine, TU Dresden, 01307 Dresden, Germany. Sebastian.stasik@uniklinikum-dresden.de.
Christian ThiedeMedical Department I, University Hospital and Faculty of Medicine, TU Dresden, 01307 Dresden, Germany. Christian.thiede@uniklinikum-dresden.de.
Uwe PlatzbeckerMedical Clinic and Policlinic 1, Hematology and Cellular Therapy, Leipzig University Hospital, 04103 Leipzig, Germany. uwe.platzbecker@medizin.uni-leipzig.de.
University Hospital Leipzig · DETechnische Universität Dresden · DE

Funding

José Carreras Leukämiestiftung 04R/2016
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The ability to detect residual levels of leukemic blasts (measurable residual disease, MRD) has already been integrated in the daily routine for treatment of patients with chronic myeloid and acute lymphoblastic leukemia. In acute myeloid leukemia (AML), a variety of mostly retrospective studies have shown that individuals in AML remission who tested positive for MRD at specific time-points or had increasing MRD levels are at significantly higher risk of relapse and death compared to MRD-negative patients. However, these studies differ with respect to the "MRD-target", time-point of MRD determination, material analyzed, and method applied. How this probably very valuable MRD information in individual patients may be adapted in the daily clinical routine, e.g., to separate patients who need more aggressive therapies from those who may be spared additional-potentially toxic-therapies is still a work-in-progress. With the exception of MRD assessment in acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL), the lack of randomized, prospective trials renders MRD-based decisions and clinical implications in AML a difficult task. As of today, we still do not have proof that early intervention in MRD-positive AML patients would improve outcomes, although this is very likely. In this article, we review the current knowledge on non-APL AML MRD assessment and possible clinical consequences.

Indexed as

AMLmeasurable residual diseasepre-emptive therapyrisk stratificationtherapeutic decision-making

Identifiers

PMID31652787
PMCPMC6893483
OpenAlexW2982170824

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.