Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31652568›Full record

ReviewAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2019

The Welfare of Pig-Hunting Dogs in Australia.

Bronwyn Orr, Richard Malik, Jacqui Norris, Mark Westman

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Serosurvey of anti-Veterinary world · 2021
    Article
  13. Animal Harms and Food Production: Informing Ethical Choices.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2021
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Bronwyn OrrSydney School of Veterinary Science, The University of Sydney, Sydney 2006, Australia. borr3726@uni.sydney.edu.au.
Richard MalikCentre for Veterinary Education, The University of Sydney, Sydney 2006, Australia. richard.malik@sydney.edu.au.
Jacqui NorrisSydney School of Veterinary Science, The University of Sydney, Sydney 2006, Australia. jacqui.norris@sydney.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0002-0003-6930
Mark WestmanSydney School of Veterinary Science, The University of Sydney, Sydney 2006, Australia. mark.westman@sydney.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0001-7400-1960

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hunting feral pigs using dogs is a popular recreational activity in Australia. Dogs are used to flush, chase, bail, and hold feral pigs, and their use for these activities is legal in some states and territories and illegal in others. However, there is little knowledge about the health and welfare of dogs owned specifically for the purpose of pig hunting. We conducted a review of the literature on working dogs in Australia and overseas to determine the likely welfare impacts confronting pig-hunting dogs. We identified numerous challenges facing pig-hunting dogs throughout their lives. Risks to welfare include overbreeding, wastage due to behavioural incompatibilities, the use of aversive training techniques including electronic shock collars, solitary kenneling and tethering, high exposure to infectious diseases including zoonotic diseases, inadequate vaccination and anthelmintic prophlyaxis, high incidence of traumatic and other injuries during hunts, climatic exposure during transportation, mortality during hunts, and a suboptimal quality of life after retirement. There are also significant welfare concerns for the wild pigs hunted in this manner. We conclude that research needs to be conducted in order to determine the current health and welfare of pig-hunting dogs, specifically in Australia. The humaneness of this method of pest control urgently requires further assessment.

Indexed as

Australiadogferal pighuntingwelfare

Identifiers

PMID31652568
PMCPMC6826489

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.