Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31652498›Full record

ReviewMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2019

Bioengineered Scaffolds as Substitutes for Grafts for Urethra Reconstruction.

Martina Culenova, Dusan Bakos, Stanislav Ziaran, Simona Bodnarova, Ivan Varga, Lubos Danisovic

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Male esthetic genital surgery: recommendations and gaps to be filled.International journal of impotence research · 2022
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Advanced Bio-Based Polymers for Astrocyte Cell Models.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Review
  9. [The application and prospects of three dimensional bioprinting in urinary system reconstruction].Sheng wu yi xue gong cheng xue za zhi = Journal of biomedical engineering = Shengwu yixue gongchengxue zazhi · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Martina CulenovaInstitute of Medical Biology, Genetics and Clinical Genetics, Faculty of Medicine, Comenius University, Sasinkova 4, 811 08 Bratislava, Slovakia. martina.galambosova@fmed.uniba.sk.
Dusan BakosInternational Centre for Applied Research and Sustainable Technology, Jamnickeho 19, 841 04 Bratislava, Slovakia. dusan.bakos@stuba.sk.
Stanislav ZiaranDepartment of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, Comenius University, Limbova 5, 833 05 Bratislava, Slovakia. stanoziaran@gmail.com.
Simona BodnarovaDepartment of Biomedical Engineering and Measurement, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Technical University of Kosice, Letna 9, 042 00 Kosice, Slovakia. simona.bodnarova@gmail.com.
Ivan VargaInstitute of Histology and Embryology, Faculty of Medicine, Comenius University, Sasinkova 4, 811 08 Bratislava, Slovakia. ivan.varga@fmed.uniba.sk.
Lubos DanisovicInstitute of Medical Biology, Genetics and Clinical Genetics, Faculty of Medicine, Comenius University, Sasinkova 4, 811 08 Bratislava, Slovakia. lubos.danisovic@fmed.uniba.sk.ORCID 0000-0002-5074-9621

Funding

Agentúra na Podporu Výskumu a Vývoja APVV-15-0111
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Urethral defects originating from congenital malformations, trauma, inflammation or carcinoma still pose a great challenge to modern urology. Recent therapies have failed many times and have not provided the expected results. This negatively affects patients' quality of life. By combining cells, bioactive molecules, and biomaterials, tissue engineering can provide promising treatment options. This review focused on scaffold systems for urethra reconstruction. We also discussed different technologies, such as electrospinning and 3D bioprinting which provide great possibility for the preparation of a hollow structure with well-defined architecture.

Indexed as

artificial urethrabioprintingelectrospinningscaffolds

Identifiers

PMID31652498
PMCPMC6829564

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.