ArticleBioscience reports2019
A novel missense variant c.G644A (p.G215E) of the RPGR gene in a Chinese family causes X-linked retinitis pigmentosa.
Article in Bioscience reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Novel compound heterozygous nonsense variants, p.L150* and p.Y3565*, of the USH2A gene in a Chinese pedigree are associated with Usher syndrome type IIA.Molecular medicine reports · 2020Article
- A case of Usher syndrome type IIA caused by a rare USH2A homozygous frameshift variant with maternal uniparental disomy (UPD) in a Chinese family.Journal of cellular and molecular medicine · 2020Article
- Identification of a novel germline BRCA2 variant in a Chinese breast cancer family.Journal of cellular and molecular medicine · 2020Article
- Targeted Next-Generation Sequencing Identified Novel Compound Heterozygous Variants in theFrontiers in genetics · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The mutations in patients with X-linked retinitis pigmentosa (xlRP) have not been well described in the Chinese population. In the present study, a five-generation Chinese retinitis pigmentosa (RP) family was recruited; targeted next-generation sequencing (TGS) was used to identify causative genes and Sanger sequencing for co-segregation. RNA-seq data analysis and revere transcriptional-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) were applied to investigate gene expression patterns of RP GTPase regulator (RPGR) in human and Rpgr in mouse. A novel, hemizygous, deleterious and missense variant: c.G644A (p.G215E) in the RPGR gene (NM_000328.2) exon 7 of X-chromosome was identified in the proband, which was co-segregated with the clinical phenotypes in this family. RNA-seq data showed that RPGR is ubiquitously expressed in 27 human tissues with testis in highest, but no eye tissues data. Then the expressions for Rpgr mRNA in mice including eye tissues were conducted and showed that Rpgr transcript is ubiquitously expressed very highly in retina and testis, and highly in other eye tissues including lens, sclera, and cornea; and expressed highly in the six different developmental times of retinal tissue. Ubiquitous expression in different tissues from eye and very high expression in the retina indicated that RPGR plays a vital role in eye functions, particularly in retina. In conclusion, our study is the first to indicate that the novel missense variant c.G644A (p.G215E) in the RPGR gene might be the disease-causing mutation in this xlRP family, expanding mutation spectrum. These findings facilitate better understanding of the molecular pathogenesis of this disease; provide new insights for genetic counseling and healthcare.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.