Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31652287›Full record

ArticlePloS one2019

A localized sanitation status index as a proxy for fecal contamination in urban Maputo, Mozambique.

Drew Capone, Zaida Adriano, David Berendes, Oliver Cumming, Robert Dreibelbis, David A Holcomb, Jackie Knee, Ian Ross, Joe Brown

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Gut microbiota and healthy longevity.Science China. Life sciences · 2024
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Household Factors of Foodborne Diarrhea in Children under Five in Two Districts of Maputo, Mozambique.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  13. PersistentEnvironmental science & technology · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Drew CaponeCivil and Environmental Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-2138-6382
Zaida AdrianoWE Consult, Maputo, Mozambique.
David BerendesWaterborne Disease Prevention Branch, Division of Foodborne, Waterborne, and Environmental Diseases, National Center for Emerging Zoonotic and Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-8303-9298
Oliver CummingDepartment of Disease Control, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-5074-8709
Robert DreibelbisDepartment of Disease Control, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-9716-0419
David A HolcombDepartment of Environmental Sciences and Engineering, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-4055-7164
Jackie KneeCivil and Environmental Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America.
Ian RossDepartment of Disease Control, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-2218-5400
Joe BrownCivil and Environmental Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-5200-4148

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sanitary surveys are used in low- and middle-income countries to assess water, sanitation, and hygiene conditions, but have rarely been compared with direct measures of environmental fecal contamination. We conducted a cross-sectional assessment of sanitary conditions and E. coli counts in soils and on surfaces of compounds (household clusters) in low-income neighborhoods of Maputo, Mozambique. We adapted the World Bank's Urban Sanitation Status Index to implement a sanitary survey tool specifically for compounds: a Localized Sanitation Status Index (LSSI) ranging from zero (poor sanitary conditions) to one (better sanitary conditions) calculated from 20 variables that characterized local sanitary conditions. We measured the variation in the LSSI with E. coli counts in soil (nine locations/compound) and surface swabs (seven locations/compound) in 80 compounds to assess reliability. Multivariable regression indicated that a ten-percentage point increase in LSSI was associated with 0.05 (95% CI: 0.00, 0.11) log10 fewer E. coli/dry gram in courtyard soil. Overall, the LSSI may be associated with fecal contamination in compound soil; however, the differences detected may not be meaningful in terms of public health hazards.

Indexed as

CitiesEscherichia coliFecesMozambiqueSanitationSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID31652287
PMCPMC6814227

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.