SynthesisMedicine2019
Prognostic value of high stanniocalcin 2 expression in solid cancers: A meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Prognostic Value of Peroxiredoxin-1 Expression in Patients with Solid Tumors: a Meta-Analysis of Cohort Study.Disease markers · 2021Pooled it
- Insulin-like growth factor role in determining the anti-cancer effect of metformin: RCT in prostate cancer patients.Endocrine connections · 2022Article
- The Oncogenic and Diagnostic Potential of Stanniocalcin 2 in Hepatocellular Carcinoma.Journal of hepatocellular carcinoma · 2022Article
- Deimination Protein Profiles inFrontiers in immunology · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSeveral studies have explored the prognostic value of stanniocalcin 2 (STC2) in various cancers, but obtained inconsistent results. Therefore, this meta-analysis was performed to determine the prognostic and clinicopathologic significance of STC2 in various cancers.
methodsEligible studies were identified by searching the online databases PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the China National Knowledge Infrastructure up to March 2019. Hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) and were calculated to clarify the correlation between STC2 expression and prognosis of different cancers. Odds ratios (ORs) with 95% CI were selected to appraise the correlation between STC2 with clinicopathologic characteristics of patients with cancer.
resultsA total of 16 eligible studies with 4074 patients with cancer were included in our meta-analysis. The results showed that high STC2 expression can predict poor overall survival (OS) for cancer (HR = 1.48, 95% CI: 1.15-1.90, P = .002). Subgroup analysis found that high STC2 expression was associated with worse OS in Asian (HR = 1.85, 95% CI: 1.35-2.55), the reported directly from articles group (HR = 1.39, 95% CI: 1.05-1.84), survival curves group (HR = 1.93, 95% CI: 1.36-2.74), and gastric cancer (HR = 1.43, 95% CI: 1.04-1.95). Furthermore, high STC2 expression was significantly related to advanced T stage (OR = 1.83, 95% CI: 1.17-2.86, P = .008), lymph node metastasis (OR = 2.29, 95% CI: 1.51-3.45, P < .001), lymphatic invasion (OR = 2.15, 95% CI: 1.53-3.02, P < .001), venous invasion (OR = 1.97, 95% CI: 1.30-2.99, P = .001), and more advanced clinical stage (OR = 2.36, 95% CI: 1.74-3.19, P < .001)
conclusion: Elevated expression of STC2 suggested a poor prognosis in patients with cancer and may serve as a new tumor marker to monitor cancer development and progression.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.