Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31651302›Full record

Trial reportBMC health services research2019

Implementing integrated services in routine behavioral health care: primary outcomes from a cluster randomized controlled trial.

Mehret T Assefa, James H Ford, Eric Osborne, Amy McIlvaine, Ahney King, Kevin Campbell, Booil Jo, Mark P McGovern

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC health services research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03007940 (Using NIATx Strategies to Implement Integrated Services in Routine Care), which is not on this map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
5.4field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03007940 nacompletednot on this map

Using NIATx Strategies to Implement Integrated Services in Routine Care

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of Wisconsin, MadisonRan2015 to 2021Enrolled49ConditionsAddiction, Mental Health DisorderArmsCoach Site Visit, Walk-through, Learning Sessions, Coaching, Business as Usual
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Mehret T AssefaCenter for Behavioral Health Services and Implementation Research, Division of Public Health & Population Sciences, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA, 94304, USA.
James H FordSchool of Pharmacy - Social and Administrative Sciences Division, University of Wisconsin - Madison, Madison, WI, 53705, USA.
Eric OsborneOffice of Behavioral Health and Managed Care, Division of Behavioral Health and Recovery, Washington State Department of Social and Health Services, Olympia, WA, 98504, USA.
Amy McIlvaineSchool of Pharmacy - Social and Administrative Sciences Division, University of Wisconsin - Madison, Madison, WI, 53705, USA.
Ahney KingOffice of Behavioral Health and Managed Care, Division of Behavioral Health and Recovery, Washington State Department of Social and Health Services, Olympia, WA, 98504, USA.
Kevin CampbellWashington State Health Care Authority, Olympia, WA, 98501, USA.
Booil JoCenter for Interdisciplinary Brain Sciences Research, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA, 94304, USA.
Mark P McGovernCenter for Behavioral Health Services and Implementation Research, Division of Public Health & Population Sciences, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA, 94304, USA. mpmcg@stanford.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9736-573X
University of Wisconsin–Madison · USWashington Department of Social and Health Services · USBehavioral Health Services · USStanford University · USVA Palo Alto Health Care System · USWashington State Department of Health · US

Funding

Stagewise Implementation-To-Target- Medications for Addiction Treatment (SITT-MAT)R01DA052975 · NIDA · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI FORD, JAMES H, MCGOVERN, MARK P · 2021 to 2025
$3.3M
Using NIATx Strategies to Implement Integrated Services in Routine CareR01DA037222 · NIDA · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI FORD, JAMES H, MCGOVERN, MARK P · 2015 to 2019
$2.9M
NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA037222NIDA NIH HHS R01DA037222NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA052975
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAn estimated 8.2 million adults in the United States live with co-occurring mental health and substance use disorders. Although the benefits of integrated treatment services for persons with co-occurring disorders has been well-established, gaps in access to integrated care persist. Implementation research can address this gap. We evaluated if the Network for the Improvement of Addiction Treatment (NIATx) implementation strategy was effective in increasing integrated services capacity among organizations treating persons with co-occurring disorders.

methodsThis study employed a cluster randomized waitlist control group design. Forty-nine addiction treatment organizations from the State of Washington were randomized into one of two study arms: (1) NIATx strategy (active implementation strategy), or (2) waitlist (control). The primary outcome was a standardized organizational measure of integrated service capability: the Dual Diagnosis in Addiction Treatment (DDCAT) Index. Intent-to-treat analyses and per-protocol analyses were conducted to address the following questions: (1) Is NIATx effective in increasing integrated service capacity? and (2) Are there differences in organizations that actually use NIATx per-protocol versus those that do not?

resultsFrom baseline to one-year post active implementation, both the NIATx strategy and waitlist arms demonstrated improvements over time in DDCAT Index total and DDCAT dimension scores. In intent-to-treat analyses, a moderate but statistically significant difference in improvement between study arms was seen only in the Program Milieu dimension (p = 0.020, Cohen's d = 0.54). In per-protocol analyses, moderate-to-large effects in Program Milieu (p = 0.002, Cohen's d = 0.91) and Continuity of Care (p = 0.026, Cohen's d = 0.63) dimensions, and in total DDCAT Index (p = 0.046, Cohen's d = 0.51) were found.

conclusionsOverall, organizations in both study arms improved DDCAT Index scores over time. Organizations in the NIATx strategy arm with full adherence to the NIATx protocol had significantly greater improvements in the primary outcome measure of integrated service capacity for persons with co-occurring disorders. TRAIL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03007940 . Retrospectively registered January 2017.

Indexed as

AdultBehavior, AddictiveCluster AnalysisDelivery of Health Care, IntegratedDiagnosis, Dual (Psychiatry)FemaleHumansMaleMental DisordersMental HealthMental Health ServicesRetrospective StudiesSubstance-Related DisordersWashingtonCo-occurring disordersImplementation researchIntegrated treatment

Identifiers

PMID31651302
PMCPMC6814122
OpenAlexW2982207736

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.