Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31651300›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2019

The role of health and advocacy organisations in assisting female sex workers to gain access to health care in South Africa.

Nosipho Faith Makhakhe, Anna Meyer-Weitz, Helen Struthers, James McIntyre

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Nosipho Faith MakhakheSchool of Applied Human Sciences, Department of Psychology, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Howard College Campus, Memorial Tower Building, 238 Mazisi Kunene Road Glenwood, Durban, 4041, South Africa. Nosipho.makhakhe@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9576-0242
Anna Meyer-WeitzSchool of Applied Human Sciences, Department of Psychology, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Howard College Campus, Memorial Tower Building, 238 Mazisi Kunene Road Glenwood, Durban, 4041, South Africa.
Helen StruthersAnova Health Institute, 12 Sherborne Road, Parktown, Johannesburg, 2193, South Africa.
James McIntyreAnova Health Institute, 12 Sherborne Road, Parktown, Johannesburg, 2193, South Africa.
Anova Health Institute · ZAUniversity of KwaZulu-Natal · ZA

Funding

NCHHSTP CDC HHS U2G PS001468U.S. President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief #5U2GPS001468
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGlobally, female sex workers (FSWs) are considered a key population group due to the high HIV prevalence. Studies show that there are various factors in some contexts that render FSWs marginalised, which limits their access to sexual reproductive health (SRH) services. Access to SRH services are particularly challenging in countries where sex work is criminalised such as is the case in South Africa. Evidently, there are alternative ways in which FSWs in this context receive non-stigmatising SRH care through non-governmental organisations. The aim of this study was to understand the functioning of these non-governmental health care services as well as to document the experiences of FSWs utilising these services.

methodsEleven focus group discussions were held with 91 FSWs. In addition, 21 in-depth individual interviews with researchers, stakeholders and FSWs were conducted. Interview guides were utilised for data collection. Informed consent was obtained from all participants. Data were analysed thematically.

resultsThe FSWs expressed challenges related to SRH care access at public health facilities. The majority felt that they could not consult for SRH-related services because of stigma. The non-governmental health and advocacy organisations providing SRH services to FSWs through their mobile facilities utilising the peer approach, have done so in a way that promotes trust between FSWs and mobile health care providers. FSWs have access to tailored services, prevention materials as well as health information. This has resulted in the normalising of HIV testing as well as SRH seeking behaviours.

conclusionThis study has established that health and advocacy organisations have attempted to fill the gap in responding to SRH care needs of FSWs amidst intersecting vulnerabilities. FSWs' engagement with these organisations has encouraged their willingness to test for HIV. However, it is important to note that these organisations operate in urban areas, thus FSWs operating outside these areas are most likely exposed to compounding health risks and lack access to tailored services.

Indexed as

Health Services AccessibilityAdultAttitude to HealthFacilities and Services UtilizationFemaleFocus GroupsHealthcare DisparitiesHealth PersonnelHIV InfectionsHumansMass ScreeningMiddle AgedOrganizationsPatient AdvocacyProfessional RoleReproductive Health ServicesDiscriminationFemale sex workersHealth and advocacy organisationsHealth careHIVStigma

Identifiers

PMID31651300
PMCPMC6814112
OpenAlexW2981800048

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.