Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31651227›Full record

Observational studyThe Journal of urology2020

African American Race is Not Associated with Risk of Reclassification during Active Surveillance: Results from the Canary Prostate Cancer Active Surveillance Study.

Jeannette M Schenk, Lisa F Newcomb, Yingye Zheng, Anna V Faino, Kehao Zhu, Yaw A Nyame, James D Brooks, Peter R Carroll, Matthew R Cooperberg, Atreya Dash and 9 more

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in The Journal of urology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Stockholm3 in a Multiethnic Cohort: Optimizing Prostate Cancer Screening to Reduce Harm and Improve Equity.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Jeannette M SchenkFred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, San Francisco, California.
Lisa F NewcombFred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, San Francisco, California.
Yingye ZhengFred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, San Francisco, California.
Anna V FainoFred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, San Francisco, California.
Kehao ZhuFred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, San Francisco, California.
Yaw A NyameUniversity of Washington, Seattle, Washington.
James D BrooksStanford University, Stanford, California.
Peter R CarrollUniversity of California-San Francisco, San Francisco, California.
Matthew R CooperbergUniversity of California-San Francisco, San Francisco, California.
Atreya DashUniversity of Washington, Seattle, Washington.
Christopher P FilsonEmory University, Atlanta, Georgia.
Martin E GleaveUniversity of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Michael LissUniversity of Texas Health Sciences Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas.
Francis M MartinEastern Virginia Medical School, Norfolk, Virginia.
Todd M MorganUniversity of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Peter S NelsonFred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, San Francisco, California.
Ian M ThompsonChristus Santa Rosa Hospital Medical Center, San Antonio, Texas.
Andrew A WagnerBeth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts.
Daniel W LinFred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, San Francisco, California.

Funding

Prostate Cancer Biomarker and Imaging Validation Alliance: Emory University, University of Alabama Birmingham, and University of Texas SouthwesternU01CA113913 · NCI · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI Martin G. Sanda · 2005 to 2026
$16.4M
Prostate cancer Active Surveillance Study (PASS) Cohort: Infrastructure Support for Cancer ResearchU01CA224255 · NCI · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI LIN, DANIEL W. · 2019 to 2023
$6.7M
NCI NIH HHS U01 CA113913NCI NIH HHS U01 CA224255
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeIn a large, prospective, multi-institutional active surveillance cohort we evaluated whether African American men are at higher risk for reclassification. MATERIALS AND

methodsThe Canary PASS (Prostate Active Surveillance Study) is a protocol driven, active surveillance cohort with a prespecified prostate specific antigen and surveillance biopsy regimen. Men included in this study had Gleason Grade Group 1 or 2 disease at diagnosis and fewer than 5 years between diagnosis and enrollment, and had undergone 1 or more surveillance biopsies. The reclassification risk, defined as an increase in the Gleason score on subsequent biopsy, was compared between African American and Caucasian American men using Cox proportional hazards models. In the subset of men who underwent delayed prostatectomy the rate of adverse pathology findings, defined as pT3a or greater disease, or Gleason Grade Group 3 or greater, was compared in African American and Caucasian American men.

resultsOf the 1,315 men 89 (7%) were African American and 1,226 (93%) were Caucasian American. There was no difference in the treatment rate in African American and Caucasian American men. In multivariate models African American race was not associated with the risk of reclassification (HR 1.16, 95% CI 0.78-1.72). Of the 441 men who underwent prostatectomy after a period of active surveillance the rate of adverse pathology was similar in those who were African American and Caucasian American (46% vs 47%, p=0.99).

conclusionsOf men on active surveillance who followed a standardized protocol of regular prostate specific antigen testing and biopsy those who were African American were not at increased risk for pathological reclassification while on active surveillance, or for adverse pathology findings at prostatectomy. Active surveillance appears to be an appropriate management strategy for African American men with favorable risk prostate cancer.

Indexed as

AgedBiopsy, Large-Core NeedleBlack or African AmericanHumansKallikreinsMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm GradingPractice Guidelines as TopicProspective StudiesProstateProstatectomyProstate-Specific AntigenProstatic NeoplasmsUnited StatesWatchful WaitingKallikreinsKLK3 protein, humanProstate-Specific AntigenAfrican Americansprostatectomyprostatic neoplasmsriskwatchful waiting

Identifiers

PMID31651227
PMCPMC7384451

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.