Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31651118›Full record

ArticleTurkish journal of medical sciences2019

Neoadjuvant volumetric modulated arc radiochemotherapy with a simultaneous integrated boost technique compared to standard chemoradiation for locally advanced rectal cancer

Natalia Jankarashvili, Sophio Kakhadze, Maia Topeshashvili, Lasha Turkiasvili, Mariam Tchiabrishvili

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Turkish journal of medical sciences, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Natalia JankarashviliDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Academician F. Todua Medical Center-Research Institute of Clinical Medicine, Tbilisi, GeorgiaORCID 0000-0003-2123-9873
Sophio KakhadzeDepartment of Radiology, Academician F. Todua Medical Center-Research Institute of Clinical Medicine, Tbilisi, GeorgiaORCID 0000-0003-1132-4177
Maia TopeshashviliDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Academician F. Todua Medical Center-Research Institute of Clinical Medicine, Tbilisi, GeorgiaORCID 0000-0003-4520-6101
Lasha TurkiasviliDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Academician F. Todua Medical Center-Research Institute of Clinical Medicine, Tbilisi, GeorgiaORCID 0000-0003-3542-0454
Mariam TchiabrishviliDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Academician F. Todua Medical Center-Research Institute of Clinical Medicine, Tbilisi, GeorgiaORCID 0000-0002-2360-2536

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background/aim: The present study aimed to examine whether the combination of neoadjuvant volumetric modulated arc radiotherapy (VMAT) using simultaneous integrated boost (SIB-VMAT) techniques and chemotherapy with capecitabine is associated with better clinical and dosimetric outcomes compared to the standard treatment. Materials and methods: The study included 59 patients with cT2–T4 rectal cancer. In the standard arm, patients (n = 37) were treated preoperatively with image-guided VMAT plus capecitabine. In the SIB arm, patients (n = 22) were treated with the SIB-VMAT technique plus capecitabine. All patients underwent radical surgical resection after neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy. Results: In the standard arm, cT0N0 was reached in 12 patients (32.4%), primary tumor clinical downstaging was observed in 22 patients (59.5%), and disease stability was achieved in 3 patients (8.1%). In the SIB arm, cT0N0 was reached in 15 patients (68.2%), primary tumor clinical downstaging was observed in 6 patients (27.3%), and disease stability was achieved in 1 patient (4.5%) (P = 0.028). Complete pathological response was observed in 11 patients (29.7%) in the standard arm and in 13 patients (59.1%) in the SIB arm (P = 0.026). In the SIB arm mild diarrhea appeared in 59.1%, moderate in 40.9%, and severe in 0% of the cases. In the standard arm mild, moderate, and severe diarrhea rates were in 54.1%, 43.2%, and 2.7%, respectively. In the SIB arm mild, moderate, and severe cystitis appeared in 63.6%, 22.7%, and 13.6%, while in the standard group mild cystitis developed in 67.6%, moderate in 24.3%, and severe in 8.1%. Mild, moderate, and severe radiation dermatitis rates were 45.5%, 45.5%, and 9.1% in the SIB group and 40.5%, 48.6%, and 10.8% in the standard group, respectively. Conclusion: The SIB-VMAT technique is effective and safe for irradiating locally advanced rectal cancer. Its effectiveness is expressed in higher clinical and pathological complete response rates and safety with the same rates of acute toxicity.

Indexed as

ChemoradiotherapyRadiotherapy, Intensity-ModulatedAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntimetabolites, AntineoplasticCapecitabineFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoadjuvant TherapyNeoplasm StagingRectal NeoplasmsAntimetabolites, AntineoplasticCapecitabineboostchemoradiotherapyneoadjuvantRectal cancer

Identifiers

PMID31651118
PMCPMC7018366
OpenAlexW2981869043

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.