Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31650761›Full record

ArticleZhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery2019

[Repair of digital volar complex soft tissue defect with heterodigital antegrade digital artery island flap innervated by digital nerve].

Hui Wang, Yongxin Huo, Ruizheng Hao, Wei Liu, Hong Chang, Junran Li, Bin Wang

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 76% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Hui WangDepartment of Hand Surgery, the Second Hospital of Tangshan, Tangshan Hebei, 063000, P.R.China.wanghuiyxx@163.com.
Yongxin HuoDepartment of Hand Surgery, the Second Hospital of Tangshan, Tangshan Hebei, 063000, P.R.China.
Ruizheng HaoDepartment of Hand Surgery, the Second Hospital of Tangshan, Tangshan Hebei, 063000, P.R.China.
Wei LiuDepartment of Hand Surgery, the Second Hospital of Tangshan, Tangshan Hebei, 063000, P.R.China.
Hong ChangDepartment of Hand Surgery, the Second Hospital of Tangshan, Tangshan Hebei, 063000, P.R.China.
Junran LiDepartment of Hand Surgery, the Second Hospital of Tangshan, Tangshan Hebei, 063000, P.R.China.
Bin WangDepartment of Hand Surgery, the Second Hospital of Tangshan, Tangshan Hebei, 063000, P.R.China.
Second Hospital of Tangshan · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo investigate the effectiveness of heterodigital antegrade digital artery island flap innervated by proper digital nerve and the dorsal branch of proper digital nerve for repairing digital volar complex soft tissue defects.

methodsBetween May 2014 and January 2018, 27 patients with digital volar complex soft tissue defects were treated. There were 17 males and 10 females with an average age of 37 years (range, 18-60 years). The causes included electric saw injury in 8 cases, twisted injury in 12 cases, and heavy pound injury in 7 case. There were 9 thumbs, 5 index fingers, 6 middle fingers, 3 ring fingers, and 4 little fingers. The interval between injury and admission ranged from 1 to 4 hours (mean, 2.5 hours). The defect size ranged from 2.2 cm×1.4 cm to 3.8 cm×2.3 cm. The mean length of unilateral proper digital nerve defect was 2.9 cm (range, 2-4 cm). All defects were repaired with heterodigital antegrade digital artery island flap innervated by the proper digital nerve and the dorsal branch of the proper digital nerve. The proper digital nerve and the dorsal branch of the proper digital nerve in the flap were anastomosed with the proper digital nerve stumps in the wound. The flap size ranged from 2.4 cm×1.6 cm to 4.1 cm×2.6 cm. A segment of dorsal branch of the proper digital nerve was intercalated into the defect of the proper digital nerve in donor site. And the defect of donor site was repaired with the full-thickness skin graft.

resultsAll flaps and skin grafts survived, and the wounds healed by first intention. All patients were followed up 12-24 months (mean, 17 months). The appearance, color, and texture of the flaps were similar to the surrounding tissue. There was no pain and double sensibility in any flap. At last follow-up, the static two-point discrimination of the flaps ranged from 4 to 8 mm (mean, 5.3 mm). And the two-point discrimination of digital pulps of recipient and donor fingers ranged from 4 to 10 mm with the average of 6.2 mm and 6.0 mm, respectively. According to the functional assessment criteria of the upper limb formulated by the Hand Surgery Society of the Chinese Medical Association, the results were excellent in 18 cases and good in 9 cases. No scar contracture was observed in donor site.

conclusionThe heterodigital antegrade digital artery island flap innervated by the proper digital nerve and the dorsal branch of the proper digital nerve provides a safe and simple technique with minimal donor site cost and satisfactory effectiveness, which could be an ideal option for repairing digital volar defect, especially for the defect complicated with digital nerve defect.

Indexed as

Finger InjuriesPlastic Surgery ProceduresSoft Tissue InjuriesAdolescentAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSkin TransplantationSurgical FlapsTreatment OutcomeYoung Adultdigital artery flapDigital volar defectnerve repairwound repair

Identifiers

PMID31650761
PMCPMC8337448
OpenAlexW2990629365

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.