Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31650623›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of geriatric psychiatry2020

Diagnostic accuracy of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) for cognitive screening in old age psychiatry: Determining cutoff scores in clinical practice. Avoiding spectrum bias caused by healthy controls.

Géraud Dautzenberg, Jeroen Lijmer, Aartjan Beekman

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of geriatric psychiatry, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07208916 (Evaluation of Grape Consumption to Improve Muscle Strength and Cognitive Function), which is not on this map. Cited by 78 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
78citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07208916 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Evaluation of Grape Consumption to Improve Muscle Strength and Cognitive Function

TypeinterventionalSponsorWestern New England UniversityRan2025 to 2026Enrolled35ConditionsHealthyArmsGrape Powder
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

78 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 138 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. [Incidence of the progression and remission of cognitive decline in older adults].Revista medica del Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Cutaneous Phosphorylated Alpha-Synuclein in Lewy Body Dementia.Annals of clinical and translational neurology · 2026
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

18 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Géraud DautzenbergDepartment of Old Age Psychiatry, Altrecht Institute for Mental Health Care, Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-8943-200X
Jeroen LijmerDepartment of Psychiatry OLVG Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Aartjan BeekmanDepartment of Psychiatry, GGZ inGeest/VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Altrecht GGZ · NLGGZ inGeest · NLOLVG · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

OBJECTIVE/

methodsThe Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) is an increasingly used screening tool for cognitive impairment. While it has been validated in multiple settings and languages, most studies have used a biased case-control design including healthy controls as comparisons not representing a clinical setting. The purpose of the present cross-sectional study is to test the criterion validity of the MoCA for mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and mild dementia (MD) in an old age psychiatry cohort (n = 710). The reference standard consists of a multidisciplinary, consensus-based diagnosis in accordance with international criteria. As a secondary outcome, the use of healthy community older adults as additional comparisons allowed us to underscore the effects of case-control spectrum-bias.

resultsThe criterion validity of the MoCA for cognitive impairment (MCI + MD) in a case-control design, using healthy controls, was satisfactory (area under the curve [AUC] 0.93; specificity of 73% less than 26), but declined in the cross-sectional design using referred but not cognitive impaired as comparisons (AUC 0.77; specificity of 37% less than 26). In an old age psychiatry setting, the MoCA is valuable for confirming normal cognition (greater than or equal to 26, 95% sensitivity), excluding MD (greater than or equal to 21; negative predictive value [NPV] 98%) and excluding MCI (greater than or equal to 26;NPV 94%); but not for diagnosing MD (less than 21; positive predictive value [PPV] 31%) or MCI (less than 26; PPV 33%).

conclusionsThis study shows that validating the MoCA using healthy controls overestimates specificity. Taking clinical and demographic characteristics into account, the MoCA is a suitable screening tool-in an old age psychiatry setting-for distinguishing between those in need of further diagnostic investigations and those who are not but not for diagnosing cognitive impairment.

Indexed as

Cognitive DysfunctionPsychiatryAgedCognitionCross-Sectional StudiesHumansMental Status and Dementia TestsNeuropsychological TestsReproducibility of ResultsSensitivity and Specificitydementiamild cognitive impairmentMoCAold age psychiatryspectrum-biasvalidation

Identifiers

PMID31650623
PMCPMC7028034
OpenAlexW2982058184

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.