ArticleIrish journal of medical science2020
Does YouTube™ offer high quality information? Evaluation of accelerated orthodontics videos.
Article in Irish journal of medical science, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Is YouTube a reliable source of health-related information? A systematic review.BMC medical education · 2022Pooled it
- Publishing Quality Statistics Videos on YouTube: Analysis of Sources and Publishing Formats.Journal of Korean medical science · 2026Article
- Educational quality and viewer engagement of Youtube videos on ceramic implants: a cross-sectional study.BMC oral health · 2026Article
- Evaluating the reliability and educational quality of YouTube™ and TikTok™ videos on custom subperiosteal implants: a cross-sectional methodological analysis.BMC oral health · 2026Article
- Article
- Is YouTube a reliable source for learning pre-endodontic build-up? A cross-sectional study.Restorative dentistry & endodontics · 2025Article
- A Scoping Review of the Quality of Orthodontic Information on YouTube.Orthodontics & craniofacial research · 2025Article
- Quality, reliability and viewer perceptions of YouTube videos on oral health during pregnancy: a mixed-methods analysis.BMC oral health · 2025Article
- Are videos uploaded by dental professionals on lip repositioning surgery of higher quality? A youtube video analysis.PloS one · 2025Article
- YouTube as a Source of Information on Public Health Ethics.Journal of Korean medical science · 2024Article
- Orthodontic Elastics: A Multivariable Analysis of YouTubeClinical, cosmetic and investigational dentistry · 2024Article
- YouTube as an information source for bleeding gums: A quantitative and qualitative analysis.PloS one · 2024Article
- Youtube videos as a source of information on digital indirect bonding: A content analysis.European oral research · 2023Article
- An assessment of the Quality of Information for Patients on YouTube™ Regarding Orthodontic Elastics.Turkish journal of orthodontics · 2022Article
- Information and Communications Technology in Dentistry: an informative and educational approach for patients with fixed orthodontic appliances.Dental press journal of orthodontics · 2022Article
- YouTube as a source of information about orthodontic clear aligners.The Angle orthodontist · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundYouTube™ is the foremost source of videos of all kinds of issues.
objectivesThe aim of this study was to investigate videos related to accelerated orthodontic treatment on YouTube™ in terms of characteristics, content, popularity and viewers' assessments.
methodsSix keywords related to accelerated orthodontic treatment were searched on YouTube™. After sorting by view-count, all 116 videos were evaluated, and the exclusion criteria were defined as: another language than English, unrelated to the topic, poor video quality and duplication. The remaining 80 videos were analyzed for general characteristics, primary purpose, information content, audio-visual quality. Also, viewers' interaction index, and viewing rate formulas were calculated for each video.
resultsThe final 80 videos were viewed by users for 177,328 times in total. Most videos were uploaded by an educational institution (n = 40; 50.0%), followed by orthodontists (n = 20; 25.0%). Most of the videos (51.25%) were classified as having excellent general information content, 30.00% were rated as moderate, and 18.75% were rated as poor. The videos generally involved educational content (47.50%), followed by product presentation (20.00%), and then technical details about accelerated orthodontics (11.25%). Only 6.25% of the videos (n = 5) had viewers' interaction index values of greater than 3.00. Videos with excellent content had significantly higher interaction index values than others (p < 0.001).
conclusionsYouTube™ could be preferred as an important source for patient information about accelerated orthodontics. Reliable informative videos should be uploaded by orthodontists or dental professionals in accelerated orthodontics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
31650452What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.