Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31650413›Full record

ArticleProbiotics and antimicrobial proteins2020

In Vitro Evaluation of Probiotic Potential of Selected Lactic Acid Bacteria Strains.

Alena I Klimko, Tatiana A Cherdyntseva, Andrei L Brioukhanov, Alexander I Netrusov

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Probiotics and antimicrobial proteins, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. ESKAPEE Pathogen Biofilm Control on Surfaces with ProbioticAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Effect ofAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Alena I KlimkoDepartment of Microbiology, Faculty of Biology, Lomonosov Moscow State University, 1/12 Lenin's Hills, Moscow, Russia, 119234.
Tatiana A CherdyntsevaDepartment of Microbiology, Faculty of Biology, Lomonosov Moscow State University, 1/12 Lenin's Hills, Moscow, Russia, 119234.
Andrei L BrioukhanovDepartment of Microbiology, Faculty of Biology, Lomonosov Moscow State University, 1/12 Lenin's Hills, Moscow, Russia, 119234.
Alexander I NetrusovDepartment of Microbiology, Faculty of Biology, Lomonosov Moscow State University, 1/12 Lenin's Hills, Moscow, Russia, 119234. anetrusov@mail.ru.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2803-3037
Lomonosov Moscow State University · RU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Research of human microbiome demonstrates that in order to develop next generation of probiotic agents, it is necessary to choose bacterial strains featured by special properties, such as the ability of the cells to attach to intestinal walls, resistance to bile and acids, bacteriocin synthesis, antioxidative and antipathogenic activity, and survivability in intestines. Thirty-three strains of lactic acid bacteria of Lactobacillus and Lactococcus genera from the Lomonosov Moscow State University Collection of Microorganisms (CM MSU) have been tested for important probiotic properties which assist these bacteria to settle effectively in intestines: cell adhesion, ability to form biofilms, agglutination with lectin (concanavalin A), and antimicrobial activity. The results of experiments clearly demonstrate that all these properties can be classified as strain characteristics and differ even within the same species. Besides the cultures of Lactobacillus with good agglutination ability with concanavalin A (Lact. caucasicus CM MSU 155, Lact. brevis CM MSU 521), we also discovered strains with high adhesion properties (Lact. acidophilus CM MSU 146-89% affinity for hexadecane; Lact. paracasei CM MSU 527-85%; Lact. plantarum CM MSU 508-78%; Lact. caucasicus CM MSU 155-70%; and Lact. delbrueckii CM MSU 571-57%), biofilm formation ability with a hydrophobic carrier (Lact. plantarum CM MSU 588-OD

Indexed as

AntibiosisProbioticsBacterial AdhesionBiofilmsLactobacillusStaphylococcus aureusAgglutination with lectinsAntimicrobial activityBiofilmsCell adhesionLactic acid bacteriaProbiotics

Identifiers

PMID31650413
OpenAlexW2982075313

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.