ArticleAIDS and behavior2020
Evaluating Measures of Pre-ART Adherence Readiness Through Associations with ART Adherence in the Early Months of Treatment.
Article in AIDS and behavior, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Applying the Transtheoretical Model and the Motivating PrEP Cascade to Better Understand the Correlates of Preexposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) Readiness Among Cisgender Black Women: A Correlational Study.Journal of racial and ethnic health disparities · 2026Article
- Examining Correlates of Pre-ART and Early ART Adherence to Identify Key Factors Influencing Adherence Readiness.AIDS and behavior · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Determining a patient's readiness to adhere well prior to the start of ART provides an opportunity to address adherence barriers before poor pill taking habits form, and ultimately improve clinical outcomes and resource utilization. Three methods of measuring adherence readiness and their comparative utility in predicting early ART adherence were examined in a sample of 176 patients preparing to start ART. Data were analyzed data from a randomized controlled trial of a cognitive-behavioral adherence intervention. Three measures of pre-ART adherence readiness (provider estimate, 1 week vitamin practice trials, and self-report [HIV Medication Readiness Scale; Transtheoretical Stages of Change item (TSOC)] were examined in association with measures of (1) ART initiation, (2) ART retention, (3) mean electronic dose-taking adherence, and (4) achievement of optimal (85+ % dose-taking) adherence, over the first 3 months of ART. Of the 176 patients, 166 (94.3%) started ART; 124 (74.7% of those who started ART; 70.5% of whole sample) completed the first 3 months of ART. Among the 124 still on ART at month 3, mean dose-taking adherence was 79.3%, and 62 (35.2% of whole sample) achieved optimal adherence. The provider estimate was the only readiness measure significantly associated with each of the four measures of early ART adherence, and it had the highest concordance statistics (71% PPV and 62.3% NPV) with optimal early ART adherence. Practice trial adherence was only associated with ART initiation and retention. Dose-taking adherence over 3 months was significantly correlated with the provider estimate and the two self-reports. Each method of early treatment adherence has its own utility, but the provider estimate had the best overall performance in predicting early ART adherence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.