Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31650327›Full record

ReviewLa Radiologia medica2020

Bone and soft tissue infections in patients with diabetic foot.

Antonio Leone, Carla Vitiello, Consolato Gullì, Anna K Sikora, Silvia Macagnino, Cesare Colosimo

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in La Radiologia medica, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. The Role of Serial Radiographs in Diagnosing Diabetic Foot Bone Osteomyelitis.Mediterranean journal of hematology and infectious diseases · 2022
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Diabetic Foot Infections: The Diagnostic Challenges.Journal of clinical medicine · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Antonio LeoneFondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore (AL, CC), Largo A. Gemelli 1, 00168, Rome, Italy. a.leonemd@tiscali.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3669-6321
Carla VitielloUniversità Cattolica del Sacro Cuore (CV, CG, SM), Largo A. Gemelli 1, 00168, Rome, Italy.
Consolato GullìUniversità Cattolica del Sacro Cuore (CV, CG, SM), Largo A. Gemelli 1, 00168, Rome, Italy.
Anna K SikoraUnità di Radiologia, Università degli Studi "Magna Graecia", Catanzaro (AKS), Italy.
Silvia MacagninoUniversità Cattolica del Sacro Cuore (CV, CG, SM), Largo A. Gemelli 1, 00168, Rome, Italy.
Cesare ColosimoFondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore (AL, CC), Largo A. Gemelli 1, 00168, Rome, Italy.
Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore · ITMagna Graecia University · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bone and soft tissue infection involving the foot is a serious complication of diabetes mellitus and represents a major public health and socioeconomic burden to National Health Services worldwide. Research in the past decade has improved diagnosis and treatment of these frequent and potentially devastating complications of diabetic foot which often remain difficult to be diagnosed and treated despite the availability of various clinical, serological, and imaging modalities. Furthermore, neuropathic osteoarthropathy can share many clinical and imaging features of osteomyelitis, and infection is often superimposed in patients with neuropathic disease. Thus, distinguishing between the two abnormalities is further complicated. Although the reference standard for diagnosis remains microbiologic analysis of bone specimens, in most clinical practice, soft tissue and bone infection involving the diabetic foot is diagnosed solely on the basis of a combination of clinical evaluation, serum inflammatory markers, and imaging modalities. Correlation between imaging findings and clinical features is very important as well as a common knowledge base for treatment team members rather than a compartmentalized view. Thus, the primary purpose of this review article was to provide radiologist and clinician with important clinical knowledge and relevant radiological semiotics, respectively, in order to facilitate a prompt diagnosis and personalised treatment of diabetic foot infections.

Indexed as

Diabetic FootDiagnosis, DifferentialHumansOsteomyelitisSoft Tissue InfectionsDiabetesDiabetic footMR imagingOsteomyelitisPersonalised medicineSoft tissue infection

Identifiers

PMID31650327
OpenAlexW2982240349

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.