Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31650321›Full record

ReviewPharmaceutical research2019

Why Wait? The Case for Treating Tuberculosis with Inhaled Drugs.

Miriam Braunstein, Anthony J Hickey, Sean Ekins

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Pharmaceutical research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Outstanding Contributions to Aerosol Pulmonary Drug Delivery.Kona : powder science and technology in Japan · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Engineered drug delivery devices to address Global Health challenges.Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society · 2021
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Molecule Property Analyses of Active Compounds forJournal of medicinal chemistry · 2020
    Review
  19. Feasibility of Aerosolized Alpha-1 Antitrypsin as a Therapeutic Option.Chronic obstructive pulmonary diseases (Miami, Fla.) · 2020
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Miriam BraunsteinDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
Anthony J HickeyRTI International, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA.
Sean EkinsUNC Catalyst for Rare Diseases, Eshelman School of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA. sean@collaborationspharma.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5691-5790

Funding

Leadership and Operations Center (LOC), AIDS Clinical Trials Group (ACTG); LOC 1/UM1AI068636 · NIAID · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI Joseph J Eron, RAJESH T GANDHI · 2011 to 2026
$1073.1M
AIDS Clinical Trials Group NetworkU01AI068636 · NIAID · SOCIAL AND SCIENTIFIC SYSTEMS, INC. · PI KURITZKES, DANIEL R. · 2006 to 2010
$147.1M
Re-Entry Supplement: Investigation of Oral Microbial Enzymes for the Detection and Treatment of Periodontal DiseaseUL1TR002489 · NCATS · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI BUSE, JOHN BERNARD, SHAHEEN, NICHOLAS J · 2018 to 2022
$48.6M
North Carolina Translational & Clinical Sciences Institute (NC TraCS)UL1TR001111 · NCATS · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI BUSE, JOHN BERNARD, CAREY, TIMOTHY S · 2013 to 2017
$43.9M
Inhaled pyrazinoic acid for tuberculosis therapyR21AI131241 · NIAID · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI BRAUNSTEIN, MIRIAM S., HICKEY, ANTHONY JAMES · 2017 to 2018
$502k
AIDS Clinical Trials Group (ACTG) AI068636DOD W81XWH1810802National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases R21AI131241NCATS NIH HHS 1UL1TR001111NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001111NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002489NC TraCS 4DR31502NIAID NIH HHS R21 AI131241NIAID NIH HHS U01 AI068636NIAID NIH HHS UM1 AI068636
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The discovery of drugs to treat tuberculosis (TB) was a major medical milestone in the twentieth century. However, from the outset, drug resistance was observed. Currently, of the 10 million people that exhibit TB symptoms each year, 450,000 have multidrug or extensively drug resistant (MDR or XDR) TB. While greater understanding of the host and pathogen (Mycobacterium tuberculosis, Mtb) coupled with scientific ingenuity will lead to new drugs and vaccines, in the meantime 4000 people die daily from TB. Thus, efforts to improve existing TB drugs should also be prioritized. Improved efficacy and decreased dose and associated toxicity of existing drugs would translate to greater compliance, life expectancy and quality of life of Mtb infected individuals. One potential strategy to improve existing drugs is to deliver them by inhalation as aerosols to the lung, the primary site of Mtb infection. Inhaled drugs are used for other pulmonary diseases, but they have yet to be utilized for TB. Inhaled therapies for TB represent an untapped opportunity that the pharmaceutical, clinical and regulatory communities should consider.

Indexed as

Administration, InhalationAerosolsAntitubercular AgentsDrug CarriersDrug LiberationDrug Resistance, MultipleHumansLungMycobacterium tuberculosisNebulizers and VaporizersTuberculosisAerosolsAntitubercular AgentsDrug Carriersinhaled drug deliveryMycobacterium tuberculosistuberculosis

Identifiers

PMID31650321
PMCPMC7607971

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.