Trial reportJournal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996)2019
Theta burst stimulation for the treatment of obsessive-compulsive disorder: a pilot study.
Trial report in Journal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Systematic Review of rTMS and dTMS in Treatment-Resistant Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder: Target- and Phenotype-Specific Outcomes.The Psychiatric quarterly · 2026Review
- Article
- Article
- Will Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Improve the Treatment of Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Current Targets and Clinical Evidence.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Targeting Three Brain Regions (Bilateral SMA, Left and Right DLPFC) Sequentially in One Session Using Combined Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation and Intermittent Theta-burst Stimulation in Treatment-refractory Obsessive-compulsive Disorder: A Case Report.Clinical psychopharmacology and neuroscience : the official scientific journal of the Korean College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2022Article
- Neuromodulation of OCD: A review of invasive and non-invasive methods.Frontiers in neurology · 2022Review
- A Case of Psychogenic Myoclonus Responding to a Novel Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Approach: Rationale, Feasibility, and Possible Neurophysiological Basis.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2020Article
- How to Design Optimal Accelerated rTMS Protocols Capable of Promoting Therapeutically Beneficial Metaplasticity.Frontiers in neurology · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A non-negligible part of patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) experiences inadequate response to pharmacological and cognitive therapies. Therefore, new approaches are required to overcome this problem. The present pilot study estimates the capacity of theta burst stimulation (TBS) in reducing OCD symptoms, also focusing on the neurophysiological basis of TBS aftereffects. Ten patients with OCD who were unsatisfactorily responsive to the pharmacological and neuropsychological treatment, participated to the present randomized crossover pilot study, in which they were subjected to a real or sham intermittent TBS (iTBS) paradigm over the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (L-DLPFC) as add-on treatment. They were randomly assigned to a real or sham iTBS in a 1:1 allocation ratio. Patients received the TBS treatment every morning, 5 days a week for 1 month, and were clinically and electrophysiologically evaluated (EEG phase synchronization and coherence) before, immediately after (T0), and one (T1), three (T3) and six (T6) months after the end of the TBS treatment. Then, each patient was subjected to the alternative treatment (that was not practiced before), and followed up to 6 months. We found that all the patients improved in OCD symptomatology up to T1, while four among them improved up to T3. These patients were those showing a more extensive reshape of frontal areas phase synchronization and frontoparietal coherence compared to the other participants. Our pilot study suggests that iTBS over L-DLPFC may represent a feasible approach to improve OCD symptoms. The efficacy of iTBS seems to depend on the extent of frontal and frontoparietal connectivity modulation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
31650286What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.