Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31650284›Full record

ArticleEJNMMI research2019

Feasibility of radioguided occult lesion localization of clip-marked lymph nodes for tailored axillary treatment in breast cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant systemic therapy.

Daan Hellingman, Maarten L Donswijk, Gonneke A O Winter-Warnars, Petra de Koekkoek-Doll, Marilyn Pinas, Yvonne Budde-van Namen, Johan Westerga, Marie-Jeanne T F D Vrancken Peeters, Nikola Kimmings, Marcel P M Stokkel

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EJNMMI research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Daan HellingmanDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Postbus 90203, 1006, BE, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3745-1580
Maarten L DonswijkDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Postbus 90203, 1006, BE, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Gonneke A O Winter-WarnarsDepartment of Radiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Postbus 90203, 1006, BE, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Petra de Koekkoek-DollDepartment of Radiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Postbus 90203, 1006, BE, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Marilyn PinasDepartment of Radiology, Slotervaart hospital, Postbus 90440, 1006, BK, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Yvonne Budde-van NamenDepartment of Radiology, Slotervaart hospital, Postbus 90440, 1006, BK, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Johan WestergaDepartment of Pathology, Slotervaart hospital, Postbus 90440, 1006, BK, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Marie-Jeanne T F D Vrancken PeetersDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Postbus 90203, 1006, BE, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Nikola KimmingsDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Slotervaart hospital, Postbus 90440, 1006, BK, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Marcel P M StokkelDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Postbus 90203, 1006, BE, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. m.stokkel@nki.nl.
The Netherlands Cancer Institute · NLSlotervaartziekenhuis · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSelective removal of initially tumor-positive axillary lymph nodes in breast cancer patients who underwent neoadjuvant systemic treatment (NST) improves the accuracy of nodal staging and provides the opportunity for more tailored axillary treatment. This study evaluated whether radioguided occult lesion localization (ROLL) of clip-marked lymph nodes is feasible in clinical practice.

methodsPrior to NST, a clip marker was placed inside a proven tumor-positive lymph node in all breast cancer patients (cTis-4N1-3 M0). After NST, technetium-99m-labeled macroaggregated albumin was injected in the clip-marked lymph nodes. The next day, these ROLL-marked nodes were selectively removed at surgery to evaluate the pathological response of the axilla.

resultsThirty-seven patients (38 axillae) underwent clip insertion. After NST, the clip was visible by ultrasound in 36 procedures (95%). In the other two patients, the ROLL-node injection was performed in a sonographically suspicious unclipped node (1), and near the clip under computed tomography guidance (1). Initial surgery successfully identified the ROLL-marked node with clip in 33 procedures (87%). Removed specimens in the other five procedures contained only the sonographically suspicious tumor-positive unclipped node (1), a node with signs of complete response but no clip (2), a clip without node (1), and tissue without node nor clip, and a second successful ROLL-node procedure was performed (1). Overall, 10 ROLL-marked nodes had no residual disease.

conclusionsThis study demonstrates that the ROLL procedure to identify clip-marked lymph nodes is feasible. This facilitates selective removal at surgery and may tailor axillary treatment in patients treated with NST.

Indexed as

axillary stagingBreast cancerneoadjuvant systemic treatmentradioguided occult lesion localizationtarget lymph node technique

Identifiers

PMID31650284
PMCPMC6811805
OpenAlexW2982142465

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.