ArticleCardiovascular and interventional radiology2020
Percutaneous Pharmaco-Mechanical Thrombectomy of Acute Symptomatic Superior Mesenteric Vein Thrombosis.
Article in Cardiovascular and interventional radiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.
- Endovascular management of acute superior mesenteric vein thrombosis: a retrospective study on thrombolysis outcomes.CVIR endovascular · 2025Article
- Hybrid Surgery for Superior Mesenteric Vein Thrombosis: A Case Report.JMA journal · 2025Article
- Massive intestinal mesenteric portal vein ischemia: Percutaneous endovascular thrombolysis as minimally invasive step-up approach.Turkish journal of surgery · 2025Article
- Tricky acute mesenteric ischemia: what can we do?Gastroenterology report · 2025Review
- Idiopathic superior mesenteric venous thrombosis requiring bowel resection: a report of four cases.Surgical case reports · 2024Article
- Primary Catheter-Directed Thrombolysis for Porto-Mesenteric Venous Thrombosis (PMVT) in Non-Cirrhotic Patients.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Article
- A single institutional experience with suction thrombectomy in acute mesenteric ischemia.Annals of vascular surgery. Brief reports and innovations · 2022Article
- Superior mesenteric venous thrombosis: Endovascular management and outcomes.World journal of clinical cases · 2022Article
- A clinical analysis of intestinal mucosal necrosis and exfoliation induced by superior mesenteric vein thrombosis: A case report.Frontiers in surgery · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo evaluate the safety and the efficacy of percutaneous pharmaco-mechanical thrombectomy (PPMT) of acute superior mesenteric vein (SMV) thrombosis.
methodsA database of patients treated between 2011 and 2018 with acute venous mesenteric ischemia (VMI) was reviewed. VMI was diagnosed in the presence of SMV thrombosis and CT evidence of jejunal thickening. All patients presented with mild to moderate peritonism, which allowed surgery to be postponed. Initial treatment consisted of heparinization. PPMT was indicated in case of worsening abdominal pain despite anticoagulation and was performed via a transjugular or transhepatic approach, using a rotational aspiration thrombectomy catheter, followed by transcatheter thrombolysis. Clinical success was defined as symptoms resolution. Technical success was defined as patency of > 50% of SMV at venography and resolution of jejunal thickening. Patients were discharged on lifelong oral anticoagulation (INR 2.5-3.5). Follow-ups were performed using CT and color Doppler ultrasound.
resultsPopulation consisted of eight males, aged 37-81 (mean 56.5 years). Causes for thrombosis were investigated. Urokinase infusion time ranged from 48 to 72 h (3,840,000-5,760,000 IU). Clinical and technical success was obtained in all cases. One patient experienced bleeding from the superior epigastric artery and was treated with embolization. One patient died of multi-organ failure after 35 days, despite resolution of SMV thrombosis. In no case was surgery required after PPMT; mean hospitalization was 14.1 days (9-24). Mean follow-up of remaining seven patients was 37.7 months (12-84 months).
conclusionPPMT of acute SMV thrombosis seems safe and effective, with an 87.5% long-term survival rate and a 12.5% major complication rate.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.