Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31650198›Full record

ReviewOperative Orthopadie und Traumatologie2020

[Oberst's block anesthesia].

Dominik Saul, Jonathan Roch, Wolfgang Lehmann, Klaus Dresing

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Operative Orthopadie und Traumatologie, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Dominik SaulKlinik für Unfallchirurgie, Orthopädie und Plastische Chirurgie, Universitätsmedizin Göttingen, Georg-August-Universität, Robert-Koch-Straße 40, 37075, Göttingen, Deutschland. Dominik.saul@med.uni-goettingen.de.
Jonathan RochKlinik für Unfallchirurgie, Orthopädie und Plastische Chirurgie, Universitätsmedizin Göttingen, Georg-August-Universität, Robert-Koch-Straße 40, 37075, Göttingen, Deutschland.
Wolfgang LehmannKlinik für Unfallchirurgie, Orthopädie und Plastische Chirurgie, Universitätsmedizin Göttingen, Georg-August-Universität, Robert-Koch-Straße 40, 37075, Göttingen, Deutschland.
Klaus DresingKlinik für Unfallchirurgie, Orthopädie und Plastische Chirurgie, Universitätsmedizin Göttingen, Georg-August-Universität, Robert-Koch-Straße 40, 37075, Göttingen, Deutschland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveComplete anesthesia of the phalanges of the fingers and toes. INDICATIONS: All lesions distal to the metacarpophalangeal/metatarsophalangeal joint. CONTRAINDICATIONS: Local infections at the injection site. Lesions proximal to the metacarpophalangeal/metatarsophalangeal joint. TECHNIQUE: A subcutaneous deposit of a 0.5-2% local anesthetic is administered dorsoradially and dorsoulnarly at the base of the metacarpophalangeal/metatarsophalangeal joint. With the cannula advanced to palmar, an additional 0.5-1.5 ml is then administered to achieve complete anesthesia. POSTOPERATIVE MANAGEMENT: The effect of the local anesthesia is self-limiting.

resultsThe Oberst block results in reliable anesthesia of the finger and toe. All surgical procedures distal to the metacarpophalangeal/metatarsophalangeal joint can be performed without pain.

Indexed as

Anesthetics, LocalMetacarpophalangeal JointAnesthesia, LocalFingersHumansToesTreatment OutcomeAnesthetics, LocalConduction-blocking anestheticsFinger jointLocal anesthesiaNerve blockNerve blockade

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.